The Cordarelle Patterson owner is trying to unload him (I don't blame him). He originally offered me Sankey + Patterson for Wallace and T Williams and I said nope. Now he wants T Will for Patterson straight up.

His roster:
QB: Romo, Flacco
RB: LBell, Bernard, Sankey, Ben Tate
WR: Calvin, Hopkins, Steve Smith, Benjamin, Patterson
TE: Owen Daniels, Dwayne Allen

My Roster:
QB: Wilson, Newton
RB: Charles, Morris, JBell, Davis
WR: Julio, VJax, Michael Floyd, Wallace, T Will
TE: J Graham, Donnell, Cameron (trying to unload Cameron)

Would you accept, reject, or counter?

(I'm leaning towards just rejecting)

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by hoopsgalore

Chicago, IL

Member since Nov 2013

8645 posts

Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:55 am to GOON

Looks like you can afford to give up Terrence Williams. You have four good receivers ahead of him. To me, it just looks like a matter of preference.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Honkus

Member since Aug 2005

51225 posts

Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:58 am to GOON

I'd take it. Throw CPatt on your bench for now and see what he can do with teddy

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by NOFLyZ0ne28

West Florida

Member since Apr 2014

876 posts

Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:12 pm to GOON

T-Will will cause just as many headaches as C-Patt. He'll have a game like last week and then put up 3 5 point weeks or less until he does something else.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by GOON

Fantasy Land

Member since Mar 2008

7399 posts

Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:15 pm to GOON

None of my first 4 WRs share a bye. So that's good - barring injury, I'd never have to play Patterson.

But scoring so far:
T Will: 12 2 10.2 21.7
Patterson: 19.8 5.6 5.4 3.8 .8

Through 4 games it's 45.9 to 34.6 in favor of T Will.

Remaining games projections also has T Will on top (according to yahoo, so take that for what it's worth).

He originally offered Ben Tate + Patterson for Cameron + T Will and then withdrew it. Should I try to talk him back into this.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by forksup