- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trade offer opinions......
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:46 pm
This trade was offered and accepted: Giovani Bernard for Dennis Pitta.
This league does not require TE's.
Would you have accepted this trade if you had Bernard?
If you were in the league would you have vetoed it?
This league does not require TE's.
Would you have accepted this trade if you had Bernard?
If you were in the league would you have vetoed it?
8
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:47 pm to Witecoco
quote:
This trade was offered and accepted: Giovani Bernard for Dennis Pitta. This league does not require TE's
quote:
veto
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:47 pm to Witecoco
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:48 pm to Witecoco
I wouldn't have accepted it. Whether or not I would veto it depends on other factors. Do you have reason to suspect collusion? It seems pretty lopsided to me.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:48 pm to Witecoco
thats a horrible trade!
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:49 pm to Witecoco
There's some collusion going on there. Veto that shite with the quickness.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:51 pm to hoopsgalore
The guy that was giving up Pitta is all upset that we vetoed the trade. He somehow thinks that it was fair trade. 
He sent me a bunch of texts saying he was quitting, and that we were all a bunch of haters.
He sent me a bunch of texts saying he was quitting, and that we were all a bunch of haters.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:55 pm to Witecoco
I'd be pissed too. You guys cockblocked him mid trade rape. It's was deserved though.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:56 pm to Peazey
quote:
Do you have reason to suspect collusion?
Excellent question. Collusion no. Manipulation yes.
Last year I offered a trade with his brother. I was loaded at receiver (ppr league) and wanted to shore up my rb's. I offer a very reasonable trade. His brother then asks him if he should accept my trade. To which he told him to just be mindful of me because Im a player. (flattering)
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:58 pm to Witecoco
quote:Do you people play for money? Or oreo's?
He sent me a bunch of texts saying he was quitting
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:58 pm to Witecoco
Very lopsided, but I'm not sure I would veto.
Sounds like the Gio owner is either dumb or inexperienced and just looked at what they did in week 1. Stupidity is not a good reason for veto.
Sounds like the Gio owner is either dumb or inexperienced and just looked at what they did in week 1. Stupidity is not a good reason for veto.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:59 pm to RB10
quote:
You guys cockblocked him mid trade rape.
Yeah.
His reaction is so worth it though.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:00 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
Sounds like the Gio owner is either dumb or inexperienced and just looked at what they did in week 1. Stupidity is not a good reason for veto.
No, but someone manipulating you to get a player like that is.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:01 pm to NOFLyZ0ne28
Work league. Bragging rights. The funny thing is. There are two girls in the league, and Both of them knew it was a horrible trade.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:04 pm to Witecoco
hell no
hell yes
hell yes
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:06 pm to Witecoco
quote:
someone manipulating you to get a player like that is.
Please explain, because I'm picturing some Manchurian Candidate type shite right now.
ETA:
quote:
Work league. Bragging rights.
All this and no money on the line? I feel like I've been manipulated now.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:15 pm to BhamTigah
Just because we don't play for money doesn't mean we don't care.
Backstory: Guy with Bernard is casual at best. Guy with Pitta tells him he needs a TE. Again TE's not required. He also tried to trade with one of the girls, asking her for Leveon Bell. Telling her he is no good and she needs to drop him. She laughed at him and denied the trade.
Backstory: Guy with Bernard is casual at best. Guy with Pitta tells him he needs a TE. Again TE's not required. He also tried to trade with one of the girls, asking her for Leveon Bell. Telling her he is no good and she needs to drop him. She laughed at him and denied the trade.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:20 pm to Witecoco
I probably wouldn't have vetoed the trade. I would have tried to warn the guy being raped.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:24 pm to Peazey
By the time I found out about the trade it was already done. We are not all ate the same work location. Just same company. I don't work at the same location as those two....so its kinda hard to warn about something like that.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 3:25 pm to Witecoco
quote:
Guy with Bernard is casual at best. Guy with Pitta tells him he needs a TE. Again TE's not required.
Still not seeing the problem. If the guy doesn't know the rules, that's his own fault.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News