- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge, prosecutor who let Ray Rice walk are same prosecuting single mom with gun
Posted on 9/10/14 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 9/10/14 at 7:54 pm
LINK
The real war on women?
quote:
Allen, a 27-year-old Philadelphia mother who says she mistakenly entered New Jersey with a handgun legally registered in her state, was not accepted into a pre-trial intervention program, unlike the former Baltimore Ravens running back who was caught on an elevator surveillance camera punching his then-fiancée and current wife. The disparate decisions, made by the same prosecutor and approved by the same judge, leave Allen facing more than three years in prison and Rice free, though disgraced.
The real war on women?
6
Posted on 9/10/14 at 8:04 pm to lsuroadie
democrats love thugs and hate women, why does this surprise you?
Posted on 9/10/14 at 8:06 pm to lsuroadie
quote:
The real war on women?
There is no war on women.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 8:15 pm to DawgfaninCa
this is what cbfckings and nbfckingc should be leading with ...
Posted on 9/10/14 at 8:39 pm to lsuroadie
What weight does the woman not wanting to press charges carry?
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:34 pm to lsuroadie
quote:
The real war on women?
On poors.
Pre-trial intervention is a system specifically designed to allow the wealthy and influential to buy themselves out of criminal convictions.
Basically, the rich folks got a bunch of draconian drug laws passed - then they realized their kids were getting arrested for drugs, so instead of changing the sentencing laws or decriminalizing drugs, they create 'pre-trial' diversion, so they can make sure their kids don't have to suffer the same fate as the poors when they get arrested for drugs. And it gets applied to other things apparently like domestic violence? Really? That's fricked that you could get off of a violent crime with pre-trial, I thought it was only for non-violent drug offenses.
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:37 pm to Scruffy
quote:
What weight does the woman not wanting to press charges carry?
I can tell you this - if I were on a jury (and I will potentially be, next Monday), and a prosecutor showed me the tape - I'd vote guilty no matter what the victim said. Wouldn't you?
She could say "I begged him to hit me" and I still wouldn't believe her. Guilty.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:39 pm to WeeWee
quote:
democrats love thugs and hate women, why does this surprise you?
quote:
The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, or VAWA, has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, sending the bill to the White House for President Barack Obama to sign.
The House passed the bill Thursday by a vote of 286-138. Every House Democrat voted in favor of the bill, while all of the 138 votes against it were cast by Republicans, though 87 GOP Representatives did vote "yea." The Senate passed the bill on Feb. 12 by a vote of 78-22, with all 22 "nay" votes coming from Republican senators.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:39 pm to Scruffy
quote:
What weight does the woman not wanting to press charges carry?
In this case it should be very little. The state can press charges regardless of what some intimidated victim decides.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:14 pm to lsuroadie
did you just discover that the criminal justice system is all fricked up?
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:14 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:go punch a woman
DawgfaninCa
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:09 pm to SpidermanTUba
If you were on a jury you would never see the elevator video. Ever. Impress me and guess why
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:10 pm to SpidermanTUba
Have you read that bill? Will you go on record right now as being 100 percent for it?
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:14 pm to lsuroadie
a misdemeanor charge and a felony charge with a mandatory minimum are not comparable. most laws (esp on the coasts) are written to create aggravating factors if guns are involved, which likely eliminates a shot at a PTD program
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:21 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:Probably, but that isn't the topic if the thread. It is referring to the prosecutor's actions.
I can tell you this - if I were on a jury (and I will potentially be, next Monday), and a prosecutor showed me the tape - I'd vote guilty no matter what the victim said. Wouldn't you?
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
most laws (esp on the coasts) are written to create aggravating factors if guns are involved
but she didn't commit a crime WITH her gun.
the prosecutor has a large window of common sense he's not using
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News