fair or unfair?

What would be "unfair" about that trade?

I wouldn't say it's unfair but Team B is getting crushed in this deal.

quote:

---

I wouldn't say it's unfair but Team B is getting crushed in this deal.

---

Think about that for a second.

if you do this before the season started, it's fine.

1 week in and people think it's "crushing"

quote:

---

I would veto that trade. It is a lateral trade that Team B crushes.

---

The veto option is only there to prevent collusion. It's a chicken shite move to veto all trades where you think one team makes out better. You don't have a crystal ball. You don't know how this trade will work out long run.

quote:

---

The veto option is only there to prevent collusion. It's a chicken shite move to veto all trades where you think one team makes out better. You don't have a crystal ball. You don't know how this trade will work out long run.

---

I disagree with that. I trade that isn't win-win should be vetoed.

It is the win-win vetoes that I have a problem with.

It isn't your job to manage everyone else's team. Worry about your own team. Let everyone else manage their team.

quote:

---

I disagree with that. I trade that isn't win-win should be vetoed.

---

This is dumb and most people in your league probably hate you.

quote:

---

Then why does veto exist? It is there for a reason. The reasons are debatable.

---

There are. Especially when, in this particular case, Team B has proven to be a pushover in trading with Team A because Team B doesn't really know much about Fantasy football. They did questionable trades last season.

quote:

---

This is dumb and most people in your league probably hate you.

---

I have never vetoed a trade.

Ok, so let's say a guy makes a trade and doesn't realize the player he traded for is injured. You letting that go through? If a trade is way unfair for one side, how do you decide if it is collusion or not?