Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

This is a really odd judicial decision

Posted on 9/5/14 at 2:05 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 2:05 pm
Big feature story in The Inquisitor today. Can't link it but here is the headline..

LINK

The gist of the story. A few years ago the perp strangled an old man and killed a young lady. He decided to have sex with the lady's dead body (anyone remember Alice Cooper's 'Cold Ethel'?

Jury voted guilty and called for Cap Pun. Judge Crichton sentenced him to death.

Defense appealed based on a mistake during jury selection made by Judge Crichton (who teaches a course on jury selection).

The question put to the juror "Would you consider mitigating circumstances like alcohol or drugs as a reason a convicted murderer should not receive capital punishment?"

Answer: "I would consider mitigating circumstances from birth...like mental retardation. But if you choose to drink and commit murder I would not discount capital punishment."

Judge Victory, who overturned the death sentence, agreed that Judge Crichton should have excluded the juror for this answer.

Judge Victory is leaving a post that Judge Crichton is running for so most people think this is a political poke in the eye from Victory to Crichton.

The law enforcement community that handled the case is absolutely livid with Judge Victory.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram