Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Most Valuable Player vs. Most Outstanding Player

Posted on 9/3/14 at 5:36 am
Posted by Random LSU Hero
2014 NFL Survivor Champion (17-0)
Member since Aug 2011
9433 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 5:36 am
In YOUR opinion... is there and should there be any difference? I know that the media has their opinion, but I want to know what Joe Fan thinks.

Personally I could go either way on this. If some one os the most OUTSTANDING player in his or her league, then they should have the most value. But if his or her team is garbage, can value be measured??
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73144 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 5:56 am to
there is a difference, but rarely is it done in practice.

In MLB, Trout should win it EASILY every year since he's insanely good and his contract is a joke
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:05 am to
quote:

is there ....any difference?


Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Depends on the player, team, and sport in question.

quote:

should there be any difference?


Depends.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:47 am to
The best player on the best team may not be as valuable to his team as the best player on an average team. One reason why I think the heisman is a joke.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram