Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Do you like having 4 knockout rounds or would you like having a 2nd group stage?

Posted on 7/14/14 at 10:20 pm
Posted by benhamin5555
Member since Oct 2009
2368 posts
Posted on 7/14/14 at 10:20 pm
A while ago the WC consisted of a group stage followed by another group stage, with the winners of the 2nd group state progressing to the semi-finals. Some older people I know have said they prefer this format, and don't know why FIFA switched.

I personally like knockout stages because of the extra drama involved with not letting the games end in draws, but on the other hand group games tend to be more exciting because teams have to try and score to get the 3 points instead of parking the bus to PKs like we saw in this WC a couple of times.
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
21749 posts
Posted on 7/14/14 at 10:41 pm to
It should never ever ever change from the current format.

Way too many games with a 2nd group stage. Club teams would be pissed at burnout and risking injury.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36159 posts
Posted on 7/14/14 at 10:42 pm to
I think the second way would be a more accurate predictor (and actually more fun overall) but that's two more games to try to fit in.

ETA: I wouldn't like going from 16 to 4. I'd rather go 16 to 8. And just don't think that'd work time-wise.
This post was edited on 7/14/14 at 10:43 pm
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20829 posts
Posted on 7/14/14 at 10:45 pm to
That made more sense in a 24 team tournament.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram