Auburn's upper deck is nearly identical to our old west upper deck...

They're similar, but AU's is longer.

quote:

---

Thank god we got rid of that ugly thing.

---

And YES!!!!!

quote:

---

and replaced it with this beautiful architecture

---

Better than this...

quote:

---

True Dat. Hopefully the new one is better looking than both

---

IMHO, they should carry the look of the SEZ addition forward along both the east and west sides. The new overhang gives more bang for the buck up top, where you need it.



That could mean room to widen the concourses up top....

That stadium looks turrible

Both their stadiums are shite.

once they put the the white bricks on the the rest of the concession stands/bathrooms it really won't look that bad as people are saying

It doesn't look bad in the first place.

quote:

---

What I noticed about Auburn's field is how close the seats are behind the goalpost. Just doesn't seem that close at LSU.

---

The south end zone is as close, our north end zone has a bit of a curve.

But Tiger Stadium win hands down over Jordan Hare Stadium as far as how close the sideline seats and upper decks are to the field....

JHS


TS


...Auburn's JHS, like a lot of the other stadiums in the SEC and around the country, suffer from pronounced sideline curves that create a lot of dead space between the stands and the field. And since the upper decks follow that same curve, those seats as well are placed further away than is the case for the same seats at Tiger Stadium.

It's as if you placed end zones on the sidelines, except it's completely dead space.