- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What if Romney were President?
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:07 am
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:07 am
First let me say I didn't vote for Romney or Obama, so I didn't have a horse in that race. But with that being said, I hear the sentiment often that both parties are the same and we are being played by both sides etc. And to a large degree, I agree with this. Both parties have their own interest, and both spend way too much tax payer money on their own causes.
With that out of the way, who here doesn't believe that we would have been way better off if Romney had won in areas like; foreign policy, the economy, the border issues, EPA restrictions, keystone pipeline,honesty, the overall mood of the country,etc.?
With that out of the way, who here doesn't believe that we would have been way better off if Romney had won in areas like; foreign policy, the economy, the border issues, EPA restrictions, keystone pipeline,honesty, the overall mood of the country,etc.?
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 10:30 am
20
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:09 am to Revelator
I believe we would be better off with Romney too.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:11 am to Revelator
I believe we would probably better off with Pat Paulsen than Obama to be honest with you.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 7:15 am
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:20 am to Revelator
I think people who watch Fox News would be happier but not for any good reason.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:21 am to Revelator
quote:
believe that we would have been way better off if Romney had won in areas like; foreign policy, the economy, the border issues, EPA restrictions, keystone pipeline,honesty, the overall mood of the country,etc.?
I don't see how Romney wanted to be president for the money. He is rich. It has to be that he either cared about the direction of the country just as he said in his campaign or he wanted some meaning in his life.
Romney is a business man not a leach who takes from the tax payer to make uncle Harry reid rich. Yes I think we would have been way better off and the jobs would be more plantiful for everyone. But we would still have the dems hollering about the rich getting rich. What they dont tell you is that the lower class benefits from the rich getting rich.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:26 am to Revelator
Statism would be moving along at a slower pace.
And , there would be horses roaming the White House grounds.
And , there would be horses roaming the White House grounds.
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 6:26 am
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:29 am to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
I think people who watch Fox News would be happier but not for any good reason.
Isn't it strange that people make these broad sweeping conclusions of people based on where they get their news?
Fox News= Republican news
All other News outlets= Democrat news
Fox is #1 in the media ratings
yet is amazingly out numbered 15-1 in terms of bias perception.
Speaking of happiness, I've learned that if you turn them all off, your mood changes and you are happier with out that clutter and arguing you see every night that gets your blood boiling depending on your own biases.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:30 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
I believe we would probably better off with Pat Paulsen to be honest with you.
Though I think we might be passed the point of no return, I think Romney would have at least slowed down the fall.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:31 am to ApexTiger
quote:not really, it is impossible to watch Fox News unless you are a Believer.
Isn't it strange that people make these broad sweeping conclusions of people based on where they get their news?
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:32 am to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
I think people who watch Fox News would be happier but not for any good reason.
So only people who watch Fox news want a better economy? You say some stupid stuff.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:33 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
I believe we would probably better off with Pat Paulsen than Obama to be honest with you.
Hell, we'd be better off with Alfred E. Newman as POTUS......
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:34 am to Revelator
We would be far better off with Romney than we are today. We would have a vastly better economy (instead of being in a recession like we are about to officially be in) We would be much closer to energy independence and our foreign policy would be much better.
I doubt we would have tens of thousands of illegal immigrants crossing the border daily.
African Americans would not have record high unemployment like they do now.
Those who voted for Obama made a huge mistake and I hope you learn from your mistake.
I doubt we would have tens of thousands of illegal immigrants crossing the border daily.
African Americans would not have record high unemployment like they do now.
Those who voted for Obama made a huge mistake and I hope you learn from your mistake.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 11:03 am
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:41 am to Revelator
Romney is proven to be a successful and competent administrator/leader so IMO that's a hell of a contrast.
Blatant corruption would be minimized plus the press would be there to point out wrong doing.
Blatant corruption would be minimized plus the press would be there to point out wrong doing.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:41 am to Revelator
quote:people who watch Fox News would think things were better when they really weren't. Or do you think Romney could've "fixed" the economy already? If so, you sure think some stupid things.
So only people who watch Fox news want a better economy? Y
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:42 am to LSUwag
quote:case in point
LSUwag
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:45 am to LSUwag
Obama has not been a presidential president imo. He has been a social president. He has been more concerned about changing the social issues of this country that he thinks need to be adjusted as opposed to being the leader of a whole country and what is important to this country as a whole.
His economic and foreign policies have been atrocious for someone to be the leader of the greatest country in the world. That observation has slipped tremendously during his tenure.
His economic and foreign policies have been atrocious for someone to be the leader of the greatest country in the world. That observation has slipped tremendously during his tenure.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:50 am to Tigah in the ATL
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/7/15 at 7:02 am
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:50 am to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
people who watch Fox News would think things were better when they really weren't. Or do you think Romney could've "fixed" the economy already? If so, you sure think some stupid things.
You do realize there are metrics for gauging the economy that doesn't matter if one is liberal or conservative right? Things are bad right now by anyone's estimation.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 7:52 am
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:01 am to catnip
quote:
don't see how Romney wanted to be president for the money. He is rich. It has to be that he either cared about the direction of the country just as he said in his campaign or he wanted some meaning in his life.
Nicely said...................I really believe Romney was "the guy." I think he would do a great job as prez...............but that ship has sailed.
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:14 am to Revelator
quote:
What if Romey were president?
Didn't know Van Smack had political aspirations.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News