Started By
Message
locked post

Corn-Ethanol Mandate Policy Killing Gulf Fisheries

Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:56 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21227 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:56 am
Anyone with a brain already knew this, but it needs repeating and was in the news yesterday.

quote:

Louisiana's spring shrimp season is officially open, but what should be a time to celebrate the annual kickoff of a key driver of the coastal economy is now overshadowed by a looming threat to the Gulf of Mexico's fragile ecosystem. The "dead zone" -- a Connecticut-sized area of low oxygen water that kills off marine life -- continues to grow in size due to U.S. ethanol policy and is threatening this year's harvest and the coastal economy.

The key factor contributing to the size and duration of this "dead zone" begins hundreds of miles away in the Corn Belt. There, the aggressive expansion of a U.S. biofuel policy called the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) in 2007 incentivized the rapid escalation of corn planted for fuel production. This push for a domestically produced "green" fuel came at a time of increased reliance on foreign oil imports and heightened demand for gasoline. Yet, the U.S. energy landscape has since drastically improved due to a domestic oil and gas production boom and improvements in vehicle efficiency technologies.

Despite this, the Renewable Fuel Standard continues to require that increasing amounts of biofuels be blended into the nation's gasoline supply. As more than 80 percent of the mandate continues to be met by corn ethanol, farms across the Midwest have converted an additional 13.5 million acres to grow corn -- a particularly resource-intensive crop. For instance, while corn was planted on 23 percent of U.S. cropland in 2009, it received 40 percent of the fertilizer used across the nation. As the corn crop expands to meet the requirements of the RFS, it demands a greater amount of fertilizer, which then runs off into the Mississippi River and ultimately makes its way into the Gulf of Mexico. The end result is catastrophic.


LINK
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57214 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:57 am to
But, but, but we're told that ethanol is "green!"
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98745 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:00 am to
Charles Grassley and Tom Harkin should be shot.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:05 am to
Corn ethanol is fricked.

This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 8:06 am
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22681 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:10 am to
this comes up every year and every year, everyone just ignores it. the dead zone is a nasty thing.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89518 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Corn ethanol is fricked.


Ace Midnight finds himself so shocked to be in agreement with Spidey, he suddenly started referring to himself in the third person.

Weird.



Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21227 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:15 am to
Of course everyone ignores it every year. The voters outside of South Louisiana and Southern MS don't care as long as they get their fresh seafood, though they'll bitch about prices going up.

And our elected prostitutes in Washington, D.C. will continue being prostitutes for whomever promises to give them sufficient money and aid their political careers.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:23 am to
quote:



Ace Midnight finds himself so shocked to be in agreement with Spidey, he suddenly started referring to himself in the third person.



Its bought and paid for by lobbyists. Sugar ethanol is far more efficient.

Corn in general is fricked.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 8:24 am
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Corn in general is fricked.


Outside of a good crawfish boil or grits, I agree.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:28 am to
So the Gulf is sensitive to pollutants from US energy interests?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89518 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Its bought and paid for by lobbyists.


A wonderful example of bipartisan corruption and tyranny.

quote:

Sugar ethanol is far more efficient.


I'm still not convinced that ethanol is a solution, at all. However, I tend to agree that a switchgrass or other solution that does not take food acreage out of the food supply - in essence, burning food - is a better way to go - if we go ethanol at all.

quote:

Corn in general is fricked.


Monsanto, brah.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:29 am to
quote:

So the Gulf is sensitive to pollutants from US energy interests?


Corn Ethanol is not in our energy interests.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

it demands a greater amount of fertilizer, which then runs off into the Mississippi River and ultimately makes its way into the Gulf of Mexico. The end result is catastrophic.


didn't the government just get a win via the Supreme Court on their argument that the EPA can exercise regulatory authority over states' cross-wind air pollutants? I'm not a lawyer, but it seems as if this could be a precedent to force the Greens to regulate corn-ethanol in a similar manner. Louisiana would certainly have legal standing for our affected coast line and waterways.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89518 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Corn Ethanol is not in our energy interests.


It's a net negative on energy - there's only a market for it because it is government mandated and subsidized.

No one would voluntarily use corn ethanol unless there was no other fuel available, period.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21227 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:33 am to
Absolutely when it's a farce for our energy interests.

Also, data backs up the claim that the dead zone is caused PRIMARILY by fertilizer run-off, not the "evil" petrochemical industry.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29379 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

I'm still not convinced that ethanol is a solution, at all. However, I tend to agree that a switchgrass or other solution that does not take food acreage out of the food supply - in essence, burning food - is a better way to go - if we go ethanol at all.


Doesn't Brazil use ethanol made from some sort of weed?
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:38 am to
I'm just trying to get a concensus. Some think drilling the Gulf isn't in our interests either. There are many idiots that are mad as hell that we are trying to protect waters in one thread, and I don't need to point out the BP apologists who said the Horizon was no big deal. It just gets confusing on here sometimes. I need to know what to be mad about!
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21227 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Doesn't Brazil use ethanol made from some sort of weed?



BP has an operation in Brazil and Florida where they convert something very similar to a cane stalk, though it appears to grow higher and thinner than sugar cane.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:


I'm still not convinced that ethanol is a solution, at all.


It may or may not be. I'm just sayin - if you're gonna make ethanol, it makes more sense to use sugar.

quote:



Monsanto, brah.


It started before them. Corn actually is a result of big evil government.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64332 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:03 am to
Its simple.
Food is burned as fuel to keep the price high so as to starve out the 3rd world.

Duh.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram