- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Most stable RAID
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:23 pm
For large terabyte hard drives, raid five is not recommended.
This would be for an 8 drive 3tb per drive system.
So, we would be between RAID 1, 6, or 10.
RAID 1 would just be mirrored drives. You could combine these drives into one large drive with windows.
This would mean you lose set of mirrored drives, and you are out of luck. But you could lose up to four and still be ok. Or you could lose two and be out of luck.
RAID 10 would basically be the same thing.
RAID 6 would allow you to lose two hard drives and still be ok.
So, it comes down to where and how the drives are likely to fail. A mechanical hard drive fail is unlikely, but could happen. It would be more likely for write errors and bad sectors or raid controller error to cause a drive problem I believe.
And because of the use of parity, I think these errors are worse for a RAID 6.
Size of the drive does not matter. Either way you go, the size will be ok.
So, what is the safest way to build this array?
RAID 6 or 10?
RAID 10 would give you 12 tb of storage. The Raid 6 would give you 15 tb even with one drive held back as a hot spare.
But the 12 tb would be enough. I would't have the hot spare in a 10 build however.
So, what says the tech masters?
This would be for an 8 drive 3tb per drive system.
So, we would be between RAID 1, 6, or 10.
RAID 1 would just be mirrored drives. You could combine these drives into one large drive with windows.
This would mean you lose set of mirrored drives, and you are out of luck. But you could lose up to four and still be ok. Or you could lose two and be out of luck.
RAID 10 would basically be the same thing.
RAID 6 would allow you to lose two hard drives and still be ok.
So, it comes down to where and how the drives are likely to fail. A mechanical hard drive fail is unlikely, but could happen. It would be more likely for write errors and bad sectors or raid controller error to cause a drive problem I believe.
And because of the use of parity, I think these errors are worse for a RAID 6.
Size of the drive does not matter. Either way you go, the size will be ok.
So, what is the safest way to build this array?
RAID 6 or 10?
RAID 10 would give you 12 tb of storage. The Raid 6 would give you 15 tb even with one drive held back as a hot spare.
But the 12 tb would be enough. I would't have the hot spare in a 10 build however.
So, what says the tech masters?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 10:46 pm to thetempleowl
I'm an amateur with storage systems, but I'm a big fan of ZFS - if you haven't looked into that, you should.
Whatever you choose, do backups religiously. Spend enough time at the start figuring out exactly what appropriate backups are for you and do them, always.
RAID set drives fail in multiples FAR more often than probability would suggest if failures were truly independent.
Whatever you choose, do backups religiously. Spend enough time at the start figuring out exactly what appropriate backups are for you and do them, always.
RAID set drives fail in multiples FAR more often than probability would suggest if failures were truly independent.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 9:51 am to thetempleowl
What is the storage used for? If a fileserver than Raid 6 would be your best bet. Raid 10 will give you better performance but less availability - better utilized for a database server. Regardless, backup backup backup.
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 9:52 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News