Started By
Message

Apple's product strategy in a nutshell

Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:18 am
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78100 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:18 am
1. Wait for other companies to release products and see what sells and what fails. (and wait...and wait...for years if necessary)

2. Take the best ideas and create something brand new using your brand as muscle since it is synomyous with ease-of-use.

3. Dumb down for masses, trickle out features to extend lifecycle, put exorbitant price tag on it.

4. PROFIT

MP3 Player. By 2001 there were 100+ MP3 player devices on the market when the iPod was introduced.

quote:

The first portable MP3 player was launched in 1997 by Saehan Information Systems,[10] which sold its “MPMan” player in Asia in spring 1998.[11] In mid-1998, the South Korean company licensed the players for North American distribution to Eiger Labs, which rebranded them as the Eiger MPMan F10 and F20.[citation needed] The flash-based players were available in 32 MB (about 6 songs) storage capacity.


Apple
quote:

The first iPod was released on October 23, 2001, about 8½ months after iTunes (Macintosh version) was released

The stainless-steel unit costs $399, has a 5GB hard drive, connects to a Mac using FireWire,


Mobile Phone - Nokia had dominated regular phone market, Blackberry the 'smartphone' market.


quote:

In 1996, Nokia released the Nokia 9000 which became their best-selling phone of that time. It was a palmtop computer-style phone combined with a PDA from HP. In early prototypes, the two devices were fixed together via a hinge in what became known as a clamshell design. When opened, the display was on the inside top surface and with a physical QWERTY keyboard on the bottom. Email and text-based web browsing was provided by the GEOS V3.0 operating system.

In June 1999, Qualcomm released a "CDMA Digital PCS Smartphone" with integrated Palm PDA and Internet connectivity, known as the "pdQ Smartphone".[12]

In early 2000, the Ericsson R380 was released by Ericsson Mobile Communications,[13] and was the first device marketed as a "smartphone".[14] It combined the functions of a mobile phone and a personal digital assistant (PDA), supported limited web browsing with a resistive touchscreen utilizing a stylus.[15]

In early 2001, Palm, Inc. introduced the Kyocera 6035, which combined a PDA with a mobile phone and operated on Verizon. It also supported limited web browsing

quote:

The original BlackBerry devices, the RIM 850 and 857, used the DataTAC network. In 2003, the more commonly known convergent smartphone BlackBerry was released, which supports push email, mobile telephone, text messaging, Internet faxing, Web browsing and other wireless information service


quote:

Pocket PC 2002, originally codenamed "Merlin",[12] was released in October 2001. Like Pocket PC 2000, it was powered by Windows CE 3.0. Although targeted mainly for 240 × 320 (QVGA) Pocket PC devices, Pocket PC 2002 was also used for Pocket PC phones, and for the first time, Smartphones.[1


quote:

The two initial iPhone models, a 4 GB model priced at US$ 499 and an 8 GB model at US$ 599, went on sale in the United States on June 29, 2007, at 6:00 pm local time,


Over 10 years to watch the industry evolve!


But guess what happened? Google snuck up behind Apple and used their very same business tactics to 'one-up' iOS with the same freedom to build something ALL NEW and used Apple's very game against them..stealing lots of Apple's iPhone ideas along the way.



Yet Google gets the hate for beating apple at its own game?

The strength of android shows simply what happens when a better company comes along.

I remember all the eye rolling initially when Google announced plans to enter the smartphone market.

People were like LOL @ google..apple's already won the market.

..course Yahoo thought the same thing back in the late 1990s...
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 11:23 am
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:21 am to
quote:

CAD703X

Your meltdowns in nearly every thread on this board are so glorious.
Posted by ZereauxSum
Lot 23E
Member since Nov 2008
10176 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:22 am to
So where exactly did Apple touch you?
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78100 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Brettesaurus Rex
quote:

ZereauxSum


jimmies are russlin'
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:24 am to
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77986 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:27 am to
quote:

CAD703X



Dude... I don't care for Apple, but damn.
Posted by ZereauxSum
Lot 23E
Member since Nov 2008
10176 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:37 am to
quote:

jimmies are russlin'


Sure are.

You should get some counseling.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

jimmies are russlin'

You wish

Man this board is gonna be fun
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Dude... I don't care for Apple, but damn.

tell me what he said that was wrong.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60268 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:45 am to
So you sold your stock when it was < 100.

Sucks for you.
Posted by ZereauxSum
Lot 23E
Member since Nov 2008
10176 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:49 am to
quote:

tell me what he said that was wrong.


I don't think anyone has disagreed with him. In fact, I agree with points 2 & 3.

The problem is that this dude has a weird obsession with companies he hates (Apple, Amazon, maybe others I don't know).

Someone close to him really needs to pull him back from the ledge.
Posted by MagicCityBlazer
Member since Nov 2010
3686 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:52 am to
There is no doubt that Apple will take things that already exist and put them into a form that people want, why is that bad exactly?
I totally agree that they do that, and that they are trying to be the expensive brand name on the market.

Where is the point that I should get indignant?
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 11:52 am
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78100 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Where is the point that I should get indignant?

Why would you be indignant? I just brought up the topic to entertain and inform.
Posted by MagicCityBlazer
Member since Nov 2010
3686 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Why would you be indignant? I just brought up the topic to entertain and inform.



You can talk up the successes of Android except you forgot the issue of a cluttered release environment where there are tons of different phones so the software is MUCH harder to write.

iOS gets more stable software and faster because you generally have a more stable environment for software development.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78100 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

iOS gets more stable software and faster because you generally have a more stable environment for software development.


iOS = closed system. designed for ease of use of one developer, apple.

android = designed for everyone to develop & play around with.

which of these 2 models made windows successful?
Posted by MagicCityBlazer
Member since Nov 2010
3686 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

which of these 2 models made windows successful?



Obviously we both know the answer to this.

Apple also had some problems in the late 90's with bad OS's and some absolute spaghetti code until they got back on track.

The apple strategy is that by giving up the ability to put iOS on other devices you get a better designed kernel for the environment its actually running on,
Android is open for sure, but it can be buggy and poorly optimized depending on the situation.
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:25 pm to
Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you.

Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Yet Google gets the hate for beating apple at its own game?


this thread seems to be proving the opposite
Posted by BACONisMEATcandy
Member since Dec 2007
46643 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:37 pm to
Please video your reaction if Amazon and Apple combine themselves into a single company
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Please video your reaction if Amazon and Apple combine themselves into a single company

I think that would destroy the universe, like matter and antimatter colliding.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram