- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New Jersey gun control bill passes Assembly, heads to governor's desk
Posted on 5/26/14 at 8:46 am
Posted on 5/26/14 at 8:46 am
Guns like a Marlin .22 rifle will be banned. I wonder if RINO Christie will sign it?
Proof this is nothing more than another attempt by the anti-American left to make a gun grab.
NJ “gun control” law would ban small bore hunting rifles
Proof this is nothing more than another attempt by the anti-American left to make a gun grab.
quote:
The gun ban that has gone to New Jersey Governor Christie for signature has been described as a “gun magazine restriction“, but it bans numerous common sport and hunting rifles. The ban has no exemption for rifles with fixed magazines, including most common .22 rimfire rifles that are used for sport and small game hunting…and almost never used in crimes. Assembly Bill 2006 bans rifles that meet this definition: (4) A semi-automatic rifle with a fixed magazine capacity exceeding [15] 10 rounds . . .
The bracket and underline show the existing and proposed laws. There are no exemptions for grandfathering. Anyone who possesses such rifles after the ban goes into effect will be guilty of a felony. This has already happened at least once, when the owner of a .22 Marlin that he won at a police raffle was convicted for owning the firearm. The model owned was either the one pictured below a very similar Marlin. It is an “assault weapon” under current New Jersey law, as it has a magazine capacity of 17.
NJ “gun control” law would ban small bore hunting rifles
Posted on 5/26/14 at 8:51 am to SavageOrangeJug
So Grandpa George goes to bed a model citizen and wakes up a felon...
Posted on 5/26/14 at 8:51 am to wickowick
quote:
So Grandpa George goes to bed a model citizen and wakes up a felon...
That about sums it up.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 8:54 am to SavageOrangeJug
I would bet 60% of gun owners have a gun that fits this discription. This is not a rare type of firearm...
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:00 am to SavageOrangeJug
Good to see Christie roast on the grill. If he signs...he knows that is the end of his Republican Presidential aspirations and *Conservative* shtick. Good riddance to that sellout.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:02 am to RCDfan1950
Christie will sign it and the GOP Establishment will still push him or Jeb for 2016
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:06 am to goldennugget
It'll be Jeb, gn. Christie has too much baggage. That Obama hug/bailout...is killer.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:27 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
It'll be Jeb
Then we will have another Democrat in the White House.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:34 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
There are no exemptions for grandfathering. Anyone who possesses such rifles after the ban goes into effect will be guilty of a felony.
And there ya go.
Confiscation, or just as good.
This post was edited on 5/26/14 at 9:35 am
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:42 am to Scoop
I agree that this is a bad law. I really don't think small .22s like this should be banned. What should be banned are AR-15s and AK-47s and large caliber handguns.
A .22 or .38 are fine for self-defense handguns if you are a responsible gun owner and go to the range and practice. Those who need .44 and .357 for self-defense are just bad shots and guys with small wieners who need a big gun to make up for it.
A .22 or .38 are fine for self-defense handguns if you are a responsible gun owner and go to the range and practice. Those who need .44 and .357 for self-defense are just bad shots and guys with small wieners who need a big gun to make up for it.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:43 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:If law enforcement agencies can own them, we should all be able to.
What should be banned are AR-15s and AK-47s and large caliber handguns.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:43 am to SavageOrangeJug
Do you live in New Jersey?
If not, why do you care?
If not, why do you care?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:43 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:This retarded shite again.
What should be banned are AR-15s and AK-47s
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:43 am to Scoop
One of the augments for going against assault weapons "they aren't used for hunting, they are extreme guns used by the right gun crazy lunatics"...
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:44 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
A .22 or .38 are fine for self-defense handguns if you are a responsible gun owner and go to the range and practice. Those who need .44 and .357 for self-defense are just bad shots and guys with small wieners who need a big gun to make up for it.
You are completely lost on this topic. Just completely lost.
Or you are just trolling.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:45 am to wickowick
If we just banned democrats from possessing guns we could prevent a lot of gun crimes.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:45 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
There are no exemptions for grandfathering. Anyone who possesses such rifles after the ban goes into effect will be guilty of a felony. This has already happened at least once, when the owner of a .22 Marlin that he won at a police raffle was convicted for owning the firearm. The model owned was either the one pictured below a very similar Marlin. It is an “assault weapon” under current New Jersey law, as it has a magazine capacity of 17.
'Nobody is trying to take your guns.'
' Gun owners are paranoid.'
etc.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:45 am to Rex
quote:
Do you live in New Jersey?
If not, why do you care?
so we should only comment on laws that directly affect us? we can't comment on stupid laws that may become a bigger movement?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 9:45 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
What should be banned are AR-15s and AK-47s and large caliber handguns.
You sound like that bunch at the DUmp and DI (DUmp II).
NO, they want complete bans.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News