Started By
Message
locked post

Oklahoma to execute two condemned inmates on same day

Posted on 4/26/14 at 11:18 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/26/14 at 11:18 pm
quote:

OKLAHOMA CITY –  Two condemned inmates at the center of Oklahoma's now-resolved legal confusion will be put to death Tuesday, the state's first double execution since 1937.

Gov. Mary Fallin announced her decision Thursday, a day after the Oklahoma Supreme Court removed one of the final obstacles standing in the way of the executions of Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner.

"The defendants had their day in court. The court has made a decision," Fallin said in a statement. "Two men that do not contest their guilt in heinous murders will now face justice, and the families and friends of their victims will now have closure."

The high court ruled late Wednesday that Lockett and Warner are not entitled to know the source of the drugs that will be used to kill them, information they had sought through a civil lawsuit.


quote:

Two convicted murders are scheduled to be executed on the same day. Today the Oklahoma Department of Corrections announced they would execute Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner on April 29.

Warner’s execution will take place at 6:00 p.m. and Lockett’s will be at 8:00 p.m.

This announcement comes after the state Supreme Court dissolved the inmates stay of execution Wednesday night.


LINK

LINK



Two executions on the same day is very surreal to see. Only 3 or 4 states have done it.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45784 posts
Posted on 4/26/14 at 11:21 pm to
Economies of scale.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/26/14 at 11:23 pm to
Efficiency in government. Unbelievable.
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 4/26/14 at 11:51 pm to
quote:

Lockett, 38, was convicted of shooting 19-year-old Stephanie Nieman with a sawed-off shotgun and watching as two accomplices buried her alive in 1999. Warner, 46, was found guilty of raping and killing his roommate's 11-month-old child in 1997.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 12:01 am to
And bleeding hearts are worried about them suffering some mild discomfort.

Appealing your sentence to prove your innocence or you think the legal system fricked up or you think your lawyers fricked up is one thing, but I have to laugh my arse off at these killers freaking the frick out over being possibly uncomfortable when the drugs get a pumping. They sure as shite didn't make it comfortable for their victims when they killed them. You see what they did and I don't think anybody could have sympathy for them.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16592 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 12:15 am to
They should mix in a little Drano into the cocktail for these two.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20878 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 1:59 am to
frick 'em. Hope they piss themselves and die like cowards.

"How can we claim to fight for justice if we do not serve justice?"
Posted by lsutothetop
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
11323 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 5:32 am to
It's not about sympathy, just being better than the people you're executing. They're still humans, as tempting and easy as it is to find excuses to treat them as something less; gratuitous pain should still be avoided where reasonably possible.

Of course, mild discomfort is a different matter from significant pain, and efficiency needn't be sacrificed in the name of avoiding it. I don't support the death penalty at all, but if it's still going to exist, then I see no reason why execution by hanging isn't acceptable. Done properly, it's instantaneous; there is no gratuitous suffering. It's not costly at all, and unlike shooting (which is the other method that comes to mind), all funeral options are still open, if the families of the condemned wish for one.
Posted by GEAUXT
Member since Nov 2007
29254 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 6:49 am to
I definitely agree hanging should be the method of choice. We've already wasted enough money on these pieces of shite, no reason for a costly execution
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39732 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 7:14 am to
At the stake. That is what they deserve.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67989 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Efficiency in government


If we started executing politicians.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79733 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 7:53 am to
quote:

They're still humans


No.

Anyone who would rape and murder an 11 month old baby is NOT human.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50549 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Anyone who would rape and murder an 11 month old baby is NOT human.


This. The only way this guy could have been considered human is if he had waived his appeals.
Posted by lsutothetop
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
11323 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:06 am to
Yes, even still. Humanity isn't a trait to be given or taken away.

Deeply sick and disturbed? Certainly.
Absolutely not someone who should be allowed to exist in normal society? Unquestionably.
Someone who should be locked away for the safety of the rest of society? No doubt.

But they're still human.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112511 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:24 am to
Posted by Swampeast
On the Mississippi
Member since Feb 2014
141 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 9:30 am to
Missouri once whacked two at the same time.

quote:

On Dec. 18, 1953 – only 81 days after the kidnapping — Hall and Heady were executed side-by-side at the Missouri State Penitentiary.




LINK
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

The high court ruled late Wednesday that Lockett and Warner are not entitled to know the source of the drugs that will be used to kill them, information they had sought through a civil lawsuit.

I'm pro-death penalty in monstrous cases such as this where guilt is not a question, but not allowing the condemned to know the mix of drugs that will kill them is total bullshite, IMV.

The punishers are supposed to be better than the punished, and there's really no need for secrecy on the method unless there's some degree of embarrassment involved. Knowledge of the cocktail mix doesn't serve the condemned for very long, obviously, but it serves us in whose name it's being administered. I want to know how I'm killing somebody. I want that somebody to know how I'm killing him.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112511 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

but not allowing the condemned to know the mix of drugs that will kill them is total bullshite,


To quote Hillary "What difference does it make?"
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62453 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 9:51 am to
The left wants to get lawsuits to stop the drug makers. I guess this is an attempt to protect them. I'd just pop then with a bolus of Potassium, the heart beats one time, and never repolarizes. Quick, as in a heart beat, no suffering, no pre-sedation crap drugs needed....
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34715 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 9:56 am to
While MLB eschews the double-header, Oklahoma embraces it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram