Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Rubio supports Luxury Car Industry Deregulation

Posted on 3/25/14 at 3:07 am
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18308 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 3:07 am
In Uber, which has felt resistance from the taxi business in cities across the country, Rubio sees a lesson in free market enterprise and the stifling effect of regulation.

“We do need regulations to protect the consumer from unfair practices and to protect the safety of the public,” Rubio said. “But what regulation should never be is a weapon that is used by connected and established industry to crowd out innovation and competitors.”

In Miami, a person wanting a non-taxi service must wait at least an hour and pay a minimum $70 regardless of the trip duration, according to Uber.

The company is fighting back.

In Tallahassee on Monday, not long after Rubio’s appearance in Washington, a panel of lawmakers narrowly approved a proposal allowing companies like Uber to circumvent municipalities and win approval from the state Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.


Read more here: LINK
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57209 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:34 am to
Is this the same company that Mitch Landrieu and the NOLA taxi industry is trying to keep out of New Orleans?
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:39 am to
Yep. Taxi commission head sent Uber a cease and desist letter

City leader threatens transportation company with arrest, fines if it brings business to NOLA
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 9:39 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89513 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:42 am to
I wonder if a workaround business model - a "subscription" to a car sharing system might work?

This is one of those areas where the government picks winners and losers, and only the winner they pick wins - everybody else, most notably, the consumer, loses.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

This is one of those areas where the government picks winners and losers, and only the winner they pick wins - everybody else, most notably, the consumer, loses.


Yep because local pols get kickbacks from taxi commissions.
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
9718 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:57 am to
quote:

I wonder if a workaround business model - a "subscription" to a car sharing system might work?


That's a good idea. If anyone wants the easiest example of why gov't regulation is never as good as the free market the cab industry is a perfect example.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18308 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 10:02 am to
It's also anti-minority (ownership wise).
Posted by duqueob
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2009
470 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 10:49 am to
Uber is awesome, i hope Rubio gets the point across and helps remove the all the crazy regulations that only help the taxi industry and not the consumers
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram