- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
PA AG Kane is mad, threatening to sue the Inquirer (Dem bribes)
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:50 am
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:50 am
Still shocked that this moron won
quote:
State Attorney General Kathleen Kane has hired one of the most feared litigators in the region, Richard A. Sprague, to represent her in possible defamation suits arising from accounts of her decision to end an undercover investigation that taped at least five Philadelphia Democrats accepting cash or gifts.
Sprague said he would launch an investigation into the conduct of the prosecutors who ran that sting operation, which began in 2010 before Kane took office. She has said the case was mismanaged, possibly tainted by racial profiling, and far too weak for any prosecutions.
Kane arrived at a Thursday morning meeting with Inquirer editors and reporters, flanked by a pair of lawyers, Sprague and his son, Thomas A. Sprague. The meeting began on an unusual note when the elder Sprague announced that Kane was his client - and that she would not speak.
...
Editor William K. Marimow defended the newspaper's treatment of the story.
"The Inquirer's coverage of the sting investigation has been meticulously and carefully reported," Marimow said.
"Our lead reporters, Angela Couloumbis and Craig McCoy, have interviewed many people with in-depth knowledge of the investigation, including members of Attorney General Kane's staff, in order to ensure that the stories are accurate, thorough, and fair," Marimow said. "These stories are the product of months of diligent and dogged reporting - not a leak from a person with a political agenda."
He added, "In my opinion, this is precisely the kind of issue that requires public scrutiny, specifically the conduct of public officials who accepted cash or gifts from an undercover agent and the quality of a three-year investigation launched and ended by a state law enforcement agency."
Sprague said that Kane had retained him Wednesday, after the editorial board meeting had been set.
He did not accuse anyone by name of seeking to harm the attorney general's reputation, but the reference was clear.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:52 am to TN Bhoy
She's gonna go after the Philly Inquirer? Really?
Despite the fact it leans to the left, unless something's changed, it was always a good newspaper that had some very good reporting.
Despite the fact it leans to the left, unless something's changed, it was always a good newspaper that had some very good reporting.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 10:17 am to udtiger
How is one enticed or profiled into accepting bribes Madam Atty General?
Posted on 3/21/14 at 10:24 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
"Our lead reporters, Angela Couloumbis and Craig McCoy, have interviewed many people with in-depth knowledge of the investigation, including members of Attorney General Kane's staff, in order to ensure that the stories are accurate, thorough, and fair," Marimow said. "These stories are the product of months of diligent and dogged reporting - not a leak from a person with a political agenda."
If this is true, which it likely is, Kane is (rightfully) fricked.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 10:30 am to Rickety Cricket
She's lawyering up yo!
Kane’s reaction to reports about her decision went from bad to worse. At first, she complained that white men were attacking her:
In the statement, Kane provided only one quote, dismissing those who questioned her decisions as “nothing more than the Good Ol’ Boys club playing political games to discredit me in order to fulfill their own selfish and improper agenda.”
The statement cited Kane’s pursuit of political-corruption cases, including the pay-to-play scandal involving Democrats tied to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and the corruption charges brought last week against Democratic State Sen. LeAnna Washington.
That was a pretty astounding escalation. It is not out of line to wonder why a state’s attorney general would drop an investigation which is said to have obtained detailed recordings of lawmakers taking bribes. The decision to dismiss the investigation under seal combined with Kane’s accusation that it was tainted by racism certainly is newsworthy and gives rise to an inference that, although we may not know exactly what went on here, something unusual did. That’s ordinarily a reason to give something more examination, not less.
But Kane, apparently frustrated by continuing scrutiny of her decision, has now escalated further, hiring counsel and suggesting that if the Inquirer continues to pursue the story, she would start suing people!
Kane’s reaction to reports about her decision went from bad to worse. At first, she complained that white men were attacking her:
In the statement, Kane provided only one quote, dismissing those who questioned her decisions as “nothing more than the Good Ol’ Boys club playing political games to discredit me in order to fulfill their own selfish and improper agenda.”
The statement cited Kane’s pursuit of political-corruption cases, including the pay-to-play scandal involving Democrats tied to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and the corruption charges brought last week against Democratic State Sen. LeAnna Washington.
That was a pretty astounding escalation. It is not out of line to wonder why a state’s attorney general would drop an investigation which is said to have obtained detailed recordings of lawmakers taking bribes. The decision to dismiss the investigation under seal combined with Kane’s accusation that it was tainted by racism certainly is newsworthy and gives rise to an inference that, although we may not know exactly what went on here, something unusual did. That’s ordinarily a reason to give something more examination, not less.
But Kane, apparently frustrated by continuing scrutiny of her decision, has now escalated further, hiring counsel and suggesting that if the Inquirer continues to pursue the story, she would start suing people!
Posted on 3/21/14 at 10:32 am to Jbird
I hope they burn that bitch to the ground and all the caught corrupt politicians with her...
Posted on 3/21/14 at 10:46 am to TN Bhoy
Wouldn't her own department be responsible for the investigation? If this is the case ,I wouldn't put a lot of faith in any criminal recourse.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 10:55 am to TN Bhoy
I hope this encourages the Inquirer to continue pursuing instead of letting it fade out like most corruption stories tend to do.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News