Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

4 Reasons insurance Premiums WILL rise next year

Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:06 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80161 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:06 am
I know I'm on a roll, but finally getting a chance to read the news...

I can't wait to get my promised decrease of $2500 or 2500%, whatever I was promised.


quote:

1. The Mix of Enrollees
Insurers say that people signing up for insurance through the new exchanges tend to be older and unhealthy. This is bad news for the Obama administration, which has stressed that younger enrollees are crucial to making the law work since they offset the costs of insuring older, sicker individuals. Early on, the White House said its goal was to have young people make up about 40 percent of total enrollees. However, the latest enrollment figures through March reveal they only make up about 27 percent of total enrollees.

Insurers have previously sounded alarms that if the administration doesn’t get enough young and healthy people to sign up, a so-called “death spiral” could occur. Though most insurers and even critics of the law don’t think a death spiral will happen, they are concerned that the enrollees—who skew older—will be a factor in raising the cost of premiums next year.

2. Administrative Rule Changes’ Impact Enrollment Numbers
When the president announced that people could stay on their non-ACA compliant policies through 2016, many Americans decided to keep their old plans, even though insurers assumed would buy coverage on the new exchanges. Since these plans are less expensive and tend to be held by younger people, the change could mean that the risk pool will shift further toward older, sicker Americans.

“We’re exasperated,” an insurance executive told The Hill. “All of these major delays on very significant portions of the law are going to change what it’s going to cost.”

3. Adjusted Medical Loss Ratio
The Obama administration is expected to announce a tweak to a provision in the law that sets a minimum medical loss ratio (MLR), Kaiser Health News reported. Under current law, insurers are required to put at least 80 percent of their total premium revenue from individual and small group market plans toward medical payments or consumer rebates, with the rest going to administrative costs and profits.

The whole idea of the law was to limit insurers’ profits and keep premiums stable. However, the rule change would alter that limit and allow insurers to spend more on administrative costs in order to help insurers cope with the rocky rollout.

4. Insurers Underpriced Plans This Year
When insurers set their prices for this year, they had to estimate what the mix of enrollments would look like. Some insurers underpriced their policies, with the intention of raising their rates the second year when they had a better idea of what to expect.


LINK
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:10 am to
gotta pay all the Board Members, the CEO, the upper management, our advertising bills and the lobbyist hundreds of millions of dollars before we can be concerned about keeping cost down for people.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80161 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:13 am to
quote:

gotta pay all the Board Members, the CEO, the upper management, our advertising bills and the lobbyist hundreds of millions of dollars before we can be concerned about keeping cost down for people.


Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9045 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Though most insurers and even critics of the law don’t think a death spiral will happen,


Why so much doubt about this? Doesn't seem like that difficult of a concept to grasp. Not enough young people sign up. Premiums go up. The next year, the higher premiums price out even more less wealthy (and younger, healthier) individuals. Around and around we go.

I feel like I must be missing something here.
This post was edited on 3/21/14 at 9:17 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80161 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I feel like I must be missing something here.


I agree... But you have to remember that the Insurance companies were given a gift in the legislation. They can act like the post office and continue to run deficits because they were guaranteed to be made whole by the legislation...

What a great world. Its a win/win for them Either way, they get their money.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98884 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:20 am to
What's the incentive for young people to sign up when they can glom onto Mom & Dad's policy until they're 26?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72129 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:21 am to
quote:

gotta pay all the Board Members, the CEO, the upper management, our advertising bills and the lobbyist hundreds of millions of dollars before we can be concerned about keeping cost down for people.


Another case of blaming people for altering their practices in response to legislation rather than blaming the legislation.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80161 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:24 am to
quote:

What's the incentive for young people to sign up when they can glom onto Mom & Dad's policy until they're 26?


Yup... I don't disagree with allowing people in school to remain on their parent's insurance until they graduate. However, I think once you graduate, you should have a 6 month window to get your own insurance.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80161 posts
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:31 am to
btw, did everyone see this quote... It is exactly what we have been predicting

quote:

“We’re exasperated,” an insurance executive told The Hill. “All of these major delays on very significant portions of the law are going to change what it’s going to cost.”
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram