- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Russia's savvy bond deal: US money might pass straight through Ukraine to Moscow
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:05 am
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:05 am
quote:Putin’s structuring of the loan as a defacto demand note, and as a tradable, liquid Euro-based English law governed bond was pretty bright. Essentially it means if we provide the Ukraine $2Bn in aid, every penny could well pass straight through to Moscow.
FORTUNE -- Just months before the toppling of its government, Russia cut a loan deal with Ukraine that would make even an ace structured finance dealmaker envious. One expert on sovereign debt has called the transaction "clever." And the deal could come back to haunt Ukraine's economy.
Back in December, Russia lent Ukraine $3 billion as part of an assistance package that was supposed to reach $15 billion. But Russia didn't just hand over money directly to Ukraine. Instead, Russian had the Ukrainian government issue $3 billion in bonds. The bonds were denominated in euros. And then Russia bought all of the bonds.
That may have seemed like a straightforward way to do the deal. Ukraine already had billions of eurobonds outstanding. So issuing more may have appeared easier than writing up a new loan agreement. Plus, the deal would give a lift to the prices of Ukraine's other eurobonds, which were already suffering from the growing political turmoil in the country.
But the roundabout loan deal had more advantages for Russia than it first appeared. Here's where things get interesting.
It turns out that Russia didn't just have Ukraine do a straight debt offering like the ones it had done before. Instead, Russia wrote into the new bond offering a provision. As part of the bond deal, Ukraine had to promise that it would keep its debt-to-GDP level below 60%. If it rose above that level, Russia had the right to demand the bonds be repaid immediately in full.
That kind of qualification in government bond deals is unusual. Mitu Gulati, a sovereign bond expert, says he has never seen a government bond with a similar debt-to-GDP provision. Most sovereign debt is "covenant-lite."
It would be hard to prove this was premeditated, but including that provision gives Russia a lot of economic leverage. At the time, Ukraine's debt-to-GDP was near 40%. But with Russian looking likely to hive off Crimea, and taking that portion of the Ukraine's economic activity with it, along with the slowdown the political unrest has caused, it's likely that by the next reading or two Ukraine's debt will be in the 60% range or beyond it.
That means Russia can ask for its money back, and at the same time add more economic hardship to Ukraine as it struggles to rebuild.
LINK
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:17 am to NC_Tigah
Seriously though. What's $3 billion to the US when we have the Federal Reserve. I mean they currently have ~$4 TRILLION in US debt on their balance sheet. Aiding the Ukraine with $3 billion is chump change for the US when you have the Federal Reserve. With that said, that is/was a savvy transaction by Putin to seal up $3 billion in petro-dollars.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:38 am to GumboPot
quote:
It would be hard to prove this was premeditated, but including that provision gives Russia a lot of economic leverage. At the time, Ukraine's debt-to-GDP was near 40%. But with Russian looking likely to hive off Crimea, and taking that portion of the Ukraine's economic activity with it, along with the slowdown the political unrest has caused, it's likely that by the next reading or two Ukraine's debt will be in the 60% range or beyond it.
If the Crimea ends up with Russia, I would think they would take that part of the debt with them...or just freakin' default.
Ukraine gets $3 billion, Russia gets Crimea. Win-win!
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:28 am to NC_Tigah
Couldn't the new Ukrainian government ignore the provision?
Posted on 3/13/14 at 2:11 pm to VOLhalla
quote:The fact it's an English law governed bond make that far more complicated.
Couldn't the new Ukrainian government ignore the provision?
Posted on 3/13/14 at 3:23 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The fact it's an English law governed bond make that far more complicated
Why? If they still make the payments then at best they are in technical default. So they are a risk for future bond sales. Big deal, they are a big risk right now because of the invasion.
If they stop making payments, that might affect some international aid packages that require a country to be current on outstanding bonds, but I bet there is a way to waive those requirements. And I think "they invaded us so we didn't pay them back" would count as a pretty good excuse.
Probably only reason they are not stopping payment is 1. it probably isn't due yet and 2. worried about natural gas being cut off.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News