Started By
Message
locked post

If Putin invaded and took over the Baltic nations next...would anyone stop him?

Posted on 3/2/14 at 3:50 pm
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45200 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 3:50 pm
Unlike Georgia and Ukraine, the Baltic nations of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are members of NATO and the EU. However, if Russian invaded and asserted control over these nations with force...would anyone do anything about it?

There are Russian ethnic minorities in each of these nations and political tensions are high. Each country has been bullied or threatened by Putin before. He could use his same rationale that the Russian-speaking people in these nations are being persecuted/threatened and therefore must protect them. This is essentially the same rationale Hitler used to invade the Sudetenland in the former Czechoslovakia prior to WWII.

Would the US and European leaders do anything other than issue statements of rhetoric and engage in handwringing?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48335 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 3:55 pm to
Probably not. I don't see the USA or anybody else mobilizing for war against Russia for any reason whatsoever, no matter what Putin does.

The USA is sick of war and will have no more of it.

This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 3:57 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

.would anyone stop him?
No. But Barack Hussein Obama and John Kerry would both be very gravely concerned.

Not just 'gravely concerned' but VERY gravely concerned.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:06 pm to
If you consider stopping him issuing a stern letter then yes
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:13 pm to
Well, being as how Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are all members of NATO, then there would be pretty swift and harsh consequences for anyone attacking them.

Anyone who believes otherwise is deluding themselves. And anyone who actually thinks Putin is going to even flirt with a move towards the Baltic states is just as delusional.
This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 4:15 pm
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37321 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

The USA is sick of war and will have no more of it.


Putin is very aware of this, which makes him much more concerning.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:16 pm to
NATO Article 5 says an attack on one member is an attack on all members.

If Russia were to invade a NATO country, the military reaction would be swift. If Ukraine were a full member of NATO, European and American armed forces would probably already be mobilizing.

Article 5 was invoked after 9/11 which led to the NATO led invasion of Afghanistan under the ISAF.
This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 4:18 pm
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:17 pm to
Hell, if Ukraine were a NATO member, Putin wouldn't even think to mobilize forces there.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27823 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:18 pm to
Treaties aren't unbreakable. I don't think we got to war over the baltics.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Hell, if Ukraine were a NATO member, Putin wouldn't even think to mobilize forces there.


Exactly.
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11366 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

If Putin invaded and took over the Baltic nations next...would anyone stop him?



Doubt it, but I don't think Putin will make such an attempt.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Treaties aren't unbreakable. I don't think we got to war over the baltics.


I'm pretty confident we would be in a conflict if a NATO country were invaded.
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Treaties aren't unbreakable.


Well sure, but I don't know why we'd even flirt with breaking the North Atlantic Treaty. It's one of the many ways we're able to assert military dominance over the Western world. Allowing a NATO member to be attacked completely undermines the very idea of collective defense, which was the purpose of the treaty in the first place.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:24 pm to
Not to mention the Baltic countries would not have any pro Russia rallies, staged or not, like in Crimea. They would immediately fight back, requiring an immediate NATO response.

Posted by rcd0808
Member since Jun 2013
876 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:27 pm to
If a NATO country is invaded we are going to war with Russia. End of story.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45200 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:28 pm to
So you really think Obama, Hollande, Cameron, Merkel, et al would send troops to face off with the Russians and tell Putin to get out or we would kick him out?

Really?

Incidentally and peripherally to the issue but nevertheless still noteworthy...during the Iraq War, Turkey (a NATO member) requested military assistance and defensive measures (primarily in the form of Patriot batteries) to defend against the stated threat of Hussein firing missiles into Turkey and NATO said no, you are on your own.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45200 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Not to mention the Baltic countries would not have any pro Russia rallies, staged or not, like in Crimea. They would immediately fight back, requiring an immediate NATO response.

Sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

If Putin invaded and took over the Baltic nations next...would anyone stop him?





Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:35 pm to
Anybody that says Nato wouldn't go to war over the Balkans doesn't know what they are talking about.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:36 pm to
NATO member = different scenario
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram