- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ron Burgandy: The Refusal to Go Away Continues
Posted on 3/2/14 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 3/2/14 at 1:56 pm
Saw that this was playing in theaters now. I think this can be translated to: disappointing box office + several people insisting and lobbying that if they left all of the dirty parts in (like they said, dammitt), it would have killed = re-release.
Anyone interested? I didn't see the original release.
Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues Super-Sized R-rated Version
Anyone interested? I didn't see the original release.
Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues Super-Sized R-rated Version
Posted on 3/2/14 at 2:03 pm to blueboy
They should just made it rated R to begin with
Posted on 3/2/14 at 2:14 pm to blueboy
Will Ferrell is like the guy down the hall in college who's funny for the first five minutes you're around him, then starts to get annoying.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 2:16 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
I understand the desire for a PG-13 or less, and how that might take some of the humor out of it, but do this version with the DVD release, not another distribution.
And if they need to go blue to be funny, maybe they aren't really that funny.
And if they need to go blue to be funny, maybe they aren't really that funny.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 2:22 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
He was saying on Fallen that they basically shot two shots for each scene. The pg 13 and rated R. He also said it's pretty much a different movie. I didn't see the pg 13 so I'll watch the R one when it comes out on DVD/Demand.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 2:41 pm to SteveLSU35
quote:
He was saying on Fallen that they basically shot two shots for each scene. The pg 13 and rated R. He also said it's pretty much a different movie. I didn't see the pg 13 so I'll watch the R one when it comes out on DVD/Demand
I saw the movie when it first came out. It had its funny parts. Didn't really have what i would say memorable lines like the first one did. But they did have some funny scenes. Some though were just misses. Where everyone including myself would just sit there in silence. Overall i thought it was about on par as the first movie. But not really what i would say, a bunch of repeat viewings. Maybe i would catch the un edited version on dvd. But not something i would be like, oh i can't wait till it comes out. If that would make sense.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 3:17 pm to blueboy
I don't see the problem with it. No one is forced to see it. If people want to see it, they will. If they don't, they won't. What's the harm? It'll push Pompeii out of theaters a week early?
Posted on 3/2/14 at 3:26 pm to blueboy
quote:
I think this can be translated to: disappointing box office
lol wut?
it made nearly double what the first movie made by pulling in $170 million world wide on a $50 million budget.
the first made $90 million on a $25 million budget.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:10 pm to Dr RC
But their projections were much higher, especially considering what they spent on marketing. And it didn't stick around for long. No, they don't consider this one a huge success.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:31 pm to blueboy
No they weren't. It was slow out of the gates, but the overall take was very impressive.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:17 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
but the overall take was very impressive.
Thanks to the first one. This would probably have the same trend the Hangover franchise had:
The Hangover: $467,483,912
The Hangover 2: $581,464,305
The Hangover 3: $362,000,072[
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:21 pm to TotesMcGotes
The story is that they made a comeback, but no one knows what they spent on marketing, the book of which they rewrote in the months-long blitz leading up to the open.
Personally, I'd hoped the blitz would fail, because that kind of media saturation is just annoying. We'll see if they deem it cost effective and have our answer.
So no one has seen the new one and can compare the two? That was the real question I was asking.
Personally, I'd hoped the blitz would fail, because that kind of media saturation is just annoying. We'll see if they deem it cost effective and have our answer.
So no one has seen the new one and can compare the two? That was the real question I was asking.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:27 pm to jmarto1
Apparently the first one didn't help out a ton, which would help explain the slow start.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News