- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Start of Life Question
Posted on 2/22/14 at 10:59 am
Posted on 2/22/14 at 10:59 am
Why is an eagle federally protected before birth but not a human being?
5
Posted on 2/22/14 at 11:01 am to Strannix
Eagle's bring more to the table than the average American.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 11:05 am to TejasPete
now you want government to protect something which is unborn, lol this shite is a mess
Posted on 2/22/14 at 11:08 am to Strannix
quote:
Why is an eagle federally protected before birth but not a human being?
Because eagles are on the verge of extinction and humans are not so it makes it okay to cull out the human population?
Posted on 2/22/14 at 11:15 am to Strannix
Because the state has more of an interest in eagles than it does the wombs of autonomous human beings, believe it or not.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 11:20 am to Strannix
Unborn eagles are protected from someone who isn't their mother ending their lives.
Unborn humans are also protected from someone who isn't their mother ending their lives.
We can debate the laws, but your comparison is a non-starter.
Unborn humans are also protected from someone who isn't their mother ending their lives.
We can debate the laws, but your comparison is a non-starter.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 11:22 am to Strannix
quote::beatdeadhorse:
Why is an eagle federally protected before birth but not a human being?
You guys get more desperate with each passing week.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News