Started By
Message

Could Jim Thorpe have played professional sports if he was 25 today?

Posted on 2/16/14 at 12:33 am
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 12:33 am
.
This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33406 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 12:41 am to
Sure, if he had access to the same nutrition and training. I read a biography of him last year and it was pretty amazing. At least one of his Olympic records stood for like 50 years or something like that.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
22171 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 2:49 am to
Jim Brown would have only been an average back in today's game..
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
57357 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 2:59 am to
No, just no.
Posted by LSUandAU
Key West, FL & Malibu (L.A.), CA
Member since Apr 2009
4948 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 3:47 am to
Yes
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11917 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 3:48 am to
quote:

Jim Brown would have only been an average back in today's game..


Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98188 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 4:17 am to
Those guys smoked, and weight training was frowned upon. Humans have evolved very little in ~100 years. Put a guy from the early 20th century on current training methods and nutrition, and he'd be indistinguishable from a modern athlete.
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14089 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 4:28 am to
Only a fool would believe he couldn't.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:50 am to
If any athlete from the days of yore had been born 25 years ago, they would have had the same motivation and knowledge as today's athletes with regards to strength and conditioning, legal PED's (eg. creatine) and illegal PED's (eg. steroids, HGH, etc.), and they would have been bigger, stronger and faster versions of themselves. The best athletes in their era would have been among the best athletes in any era. As for Jim Thorpe, I doubt that he could make it in MLB today, since he was only a journeyman baseball player in his era, and that was long before MLB integrated or saw the influx of Hispanics and Asians that it has today.
This post was edited on 2/16/14 at 9:49 am
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6373 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:52 am to
quote:

I truly believe that today's athletes are better than those of the past (on average) and have my doubts about how well legends would stack up against them.


I've always wondered upon what basis people from these opinions.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34476 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:57 am to
Yes yes and yes. If Otto Graham, Johnny Unitas and Sammy Baugh were born in 1976, the 98 QB class would have made 83 look pedestrian. People don't give older elite atheletes enough credit.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162230 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Sure, if he had access to the same nutrition and training.

People tend to forget that that's the key in the equation.

It's not like the human species has evolved into some super athlete species in a matter of under 100 years. That's just absurd.

Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34674 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:00 am to
quote:

only a journeyman baseball player


True, but I see no reason he couldn't be a Chuck Cecil-type safety. From all accounts, Thorpe hit like a truck.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202942 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Jim Brown would have only been an average back in today's game..




Stupid is as STUPID does.....
Posted by LSUFanNTX
Seabrook, TX
Member since May 2005
9108 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Otto Graham, Johnny Unitas and Sammy Baugh


Plus the rules back then pretty much allowed the defense to do anything but kill someone.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34674 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:15 am to
Baugh said the defense could, and would, hit the QB until the whistle blew, whether he had the ball or not. Roughing the passer? What's that??
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:23 am to
quote:

I've always wondered upon what basis people from these opinions.


My opinion is based on the rationale that A) blacks weren't part of the equation, B) population increase means more extremes/outliers, and C) pre and post natal nutrition was inferior back then.

Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Those guys smoked, and weight training was frowned upon. Humans have evolved very little in ~100 years. Put a guy from the early 20th century on current training methods and nutrition, and he'd be indistinguishable from a modern athlete.

A little LSU history to put this in perspective. LSU Hall of Famer Glenn "Slats" Hardin was a sprinter/hurdler who did the heavy lifting on LSU's 1933 track and field team which won the schools first national championship in any sport. He was the 1936 Olympic gold medalist, the 1932 Olympic silver medalist and a two-time NCAA champion in the 400 meter hurdles, as well as being a rival, friend and 1936 Olympic teammate of Jesse Owens. He was undefeated in the 400 meter-hurdles from 1932 to 1936 and set the world record which stood for 19 years.

A couple of years ago, I had a conversation with Hardin's son Billy, who was the 1964 NCAA 400-meter hurdles champion, in which he described what it was like to be a track and field athlete in his father's era. Of course I had already suspected that the training methods were a lot more primitive than today's methods, but he also pointed out that the 1936 Olympic team had to take a nine-day ship ride over rough seas to get to Berlin, which totally interrupted their normal training regimen right before the Olympics were due to start. Today's Olympic track and field athletes typically fly to the site of the Olympics two weeks before the track and field competition starts to give themselves time to acclimate and recover from jet lag.

And let's not forget that Hardin competed his entire career on dirt tracks. He was an old man in his 60's before he ever set foot on Bernie Moore stadium's first synthetic track. Billy recalled that day, saying that his father took a few steps, jumped up and down a couple of times, and then let out a sigh and said, "Ooooh, what I wouldn't give to be young just for one day to run on this track".

Listening to these stories in amazement were two other LSU track and field greats, 2008 NCAA 100-meter champion and Beijing Olympic 100-meter silver medalist Richard Thompson and 2007 NCAA 400-meter hurdles champion Isa Phillips. After hearing Billy Hardin put that era in perspective, both Thompson and Phillips were convinced that Slats Hardin would have no problem competing with today's athletes.

Hardin's best time in the 400-meter hurdles stood as the school record until 1964 and still ranks him in the top ten in school history. Jesse Owens' best distance in the long jump stood as the world record until 1960 and the Ohio State school record until May 2013. And now you know the rest of the story.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Baugh said the defense could, and would, hit the QB until the whistle blew, whether he had the ball or not. Roughing the passer? What's that??

Can you imagine what would happen if a player did to Tom Brady or Peyton Manning what Turkey Jones did to Terry Bradshaw in this video?

LINK
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6373 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

My opinion is based on the rationale that A) blacks weren't part of the equation, B) population increase means more extremes/outliers, and C) pre and post natal nutrition was inferior back then.


Well, obviously if you had a time machine and went back and grabbed legendary athletes and brought them to the present they would be disadvantaged compared to modern athletes.

But given access to equal nutrition and training regimens, I don't think there's any basis to say they couldn't stack up. I don't thick base athleticism has improved that greatly over the last 100 years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram