Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

OT Spinoff from Tyson v. Lee - Marciano-Ali - in their prime, who you got?

Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:19 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89483 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:19 pm


Maybe this should be MSB, but:

A. I never go over there, and

2. This was inspired by the OT Mike Tyson/Bruce Lee thread from Valentine's Day.

Computers in 1970 said Marciano, but that was before Ali's comeback. I say Marciano, but only because Ali tended to have trouble with that sort of fighter (Frazier, Norton). Although Marciano had no professional losses, he also did not face (and defeat) the caliber of fighter Ali did (Liston, Frazier, Foreman). However, he had one of the hardest punches in history, and absorbed more punishment in wins, certainly cumulatively, than virtually any heavyweight and was rarely even knocked down.

Fight rules by the 1960s and 1970s would likely have resulted in a number of fights lost by Marciano because he was an easy bleeder, so the timing and referee may have impacted such a bout.
Posted by Traveler
I'm not late-I'm early for tomorrow
Member since Sep 2003
24255 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:29 pm to
Tough call, but I would give Ali just a slight edge and that's only because Marciano had no experience (that I know of) with Ali's style of "float-sting" coupled with Ali's reach.

How about Frazier/Tyson?
Posted by cattus
Member since Jan 2009
13416 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:35 pm to
Marciano
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
20956 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:36 pm to
Mike Tyson in his prime.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89483 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Ali just a slight edge and that's only because Marciano had no experience (that I know of) with Ali's style of "float-sting" coupled with Ali's reach.


I think Ali's strategy would be to keep his distance with the jab and try to close Rocky's eyes and/or open up his nose.

Marciano had a unique boxing style - none - so he would have just put his head down, move forward and throw really, really hard punches - he did this in 100% of his professional fights.

Someone once wrote something to the effect, "How demoralizing it must have been to fight Rocky Marciano - knowing that, from the time the bell rang, until the round ended, he was going to be on you, throwing hard punches - and there was nothing in the world you could do about it?"

This post was edited on 2/15/14 at 1:47 pm
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3944 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 1:52 pm to
Tyson. No doubt. Ali wouldn't last 3 rounds in Tyson's prime.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30023 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 2:04 pm to
If Tyson was still with Cus D'Amato he'd be hard to beat. He was a good defensive fighter with Cus. After that, he got hit a lot.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70896 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Someone once wrote something to the effect, "How demoralizing it must have been to fight Rocky Marciano - knowing that, from the time the bell rang, until the round ended, he was going to be on you, throwing hard punches - and there was nothing in the world you could do about it?"


The most demoralizing part is that you could hit him and hit him and hit him, and he wouldn't go down.

Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68475 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 2:13 pm to
Lee beats Tyson

Ali beats Marciano

Ali beats Tyson

Tyson beats Marciano

Lee beats Marciano

Lee beats Ali
Posted by CajunBandit
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
2885 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 2:50 pm to
Marciano was about 188 in his prime. He would stand no to little chance against a 45 pound heavier and much taller Ali. The entire fight would hinge on Marciano cornering Ali and keeping him there for a ko. With Clay's superior footwork that is not likely to happen.

Today Marciano would compete as a cruiserweight, and with modern training would likely be a champ. Ali would probably be heaviweight champ. And each of those divisions would be better for it.
This post was edited on 2/15/14 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79617 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 3:10 pm to
Tyson in his prime was a meat grinder.

But in both of their primes? Ali leaves Tyson in a heap in the middle of the ring. He wasn't quite as strong as Tyson, but he was a much better combination of speed and power.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89483 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Marciano was about 188 in his prime. He would stand no to little chance against a 45 pound heavier and much taller Ali.


Ali talks to Cosell about Rocky
Posted by CajunBandit
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
2885 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 3:34 pm to
Prime Tyson doesn't get enough credit for his speed or countering. I think Tyson beats Ali. Either opinion is plenty valid, though.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98138 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 3:39 pm to
Ali had the reach and was amazingly fast.
Posted by CajunBandit
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
2885 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 3:45 pm to
Thanks for the link, never saw that. Ali is very gracious in that interview, however, my opinion is unchanged. Both were great fighters and while I like Rocky better, I feel like the skills and measurables would be insurmountable.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89483 posts
Posted on 2/15/14 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Ali had the reach and was amazingly fast.



No question, but like I said earlier - fighters who were more similar to Marciano - Frazier and Norton, most notably, tended to give Ali the biggest problems - other tall, upright "boxers" tended to wither in front of Ali, who was exceptionally long, as well as fast as you suggest.

It is easy to forget, especially if you see the pictures of young Cassius Clay at the Olympics that Ali fought as a professional, typically 215 and all the way up to 239 (although the sweet spot was probably right at 220) - which makes a lot of the film of the great fights even more impressive - that's 6'3", 6'4", or so, 220 pounds moving that well. To quote Smokin' Joe, "People forget, that's a big man." So, Rocky would be giving up potentially 30+ pounds to Ali, who was, unquestionably a faster, more agile fighter, who also possessed knockout power (albeit in combinations), taller, heavier and with better offensive and defensive boxing skills. That's a tall order for even the Brockton Bomber.

I just found it interesting the respect that Ali had for Marciano, as opposed to Frazier - he told Cosell he thought Marciano was better than Frazier, and noted he (Ali) barely got past Frazier a couple of times.

I also like the quote where Ali says, "You can't teach kids to fight like Marciano fought." However, that's probably true of Ali - the most complete heavyweight boxer - perhaps only lacking one-punch knockout power to be unquestioned as the GOAT (despite the self-applied moniker). Tall, quick, with quick hands, quick feet - really the whole range of punches, lateral movement, head movement and a great brain for the sport.

Louis perhaps is next in line, good size for his day - and he could adjust from a boxing style to a slugging style, with great power, great defensive skills. Johnson and Sullivan were great, but it is difficult to go back that far.

The swarmers tend to be popular, though. I certainly like them - Dempsey, Marciano, Patterson, Frazier, Tyson - the best defense is a good offense.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram