Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

A letter from Clint Eastwood to film critic Andrew Sarris

Posted on 2/13/14 at 9:35 am
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141667 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 9:35 am
Andrew Sarris of The Village Voice (who almost single-handedly established the dubious "auteur theory" in the US) and Pauline Kael (of "Everybody I know voted for McGovern" infamy) of the New Yorker were probably the two most influential American film critics ever.

After Sarris published an essay on the Dirty Harry franchise, Eastwood wrote this letter in response:

Posted by Fletch F Fletch
The Seat of Caddo Parish
Member since Jan 2009
6474 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 11:31 am to
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77947 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 11:56 am to
<3 eastwood
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 12:08 pm to
Well stated Mr. Eastwood!!
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36403 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 12:40 pm to
Even at his age today Clint would demolish one of those miserable Northeastern leftist wankers.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79119 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 2:33 pm to
I love to peruse war/patriotic movie reviews on RT to count how many times those idiots throw out "jingoistic."

Film critics may be the most worthless humans in America.
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
5470 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:32 pm to
I liked The Bequiled which apparently puts me in the same camp with the French who liked it more than American audiences. Eastwood's surprise that little was made of its exploration of the effects of (the Viet-Nam?) war on soldiers and society seems misplaced.

The Beguiled seemed to me more akin to Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte as creepy piece of Southern Gothic with a heavy dose of Freudian sexual tension than a genuine anti-war movie like 1971's Johnny Got His Gun. Eastwood may not specifically say his movie was a trailblazing anti-war statement but he seems to imply it. I don't recall this take on the movie at it's release.

It seems that he was writing the letter in the late 70's when it was becoming acceptable to touch the raw nerve of Viet Nam and probably viewed The Beguiled through that prism. Or maybe he is simply saying that any war film that showed anything negative about war was risky in 1971.

In any event, Eastwood hit Kael's take on Dirty Harry on the head. I remember the screams and howls of protest from the "liberals" who did not have the sympathy, understanding and compassion for crime's victims that Harry Callahan had.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram