Started By
Message
locked post

EPA Proposes Restrictions on New Wood Stoves

Posted on 1/7/14 at 8:55 am
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19307 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 8:55 am
LINK

So let me understand things here: coal is bad because it is so polluting (plus the risk of miners being trapped in a cave-in), oil is bad because a blowout can cause irreparable damage to the oceans (and the beaches), and natural gas is bad due to fracking (which pollutes nearby water tables and/or causes earthquakes).

Plus, as we learned yesterday from the article on former Congressman Roscoe Bartlett, the grid will go down at some point (either by EMP attack or solar flares, most likely the latter).

So I want to get off the grid and install a wood-burning stove. Yet EPA now has a problem with that.

So when will I get my ObamaStove that runs on pixie dust and unicorn poop?
This post was edited on 1/7/14 at 8:56 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67906 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 8:58 am to
quote:

The EPA will take public comment on the proposed changes for 90 days.


at least we have a chance to tell them what we think
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 8:58 am to
gonna be a run on fire pits @ Home Depot soon!


I mean frick, can we disband this group of morons already ?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64336 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:03 am to
They destroy the evidence of murdered trees. What do yall expect
This post was edited on 1/7/14 at 9:03 am
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:06 am to
The aliens the Canadian defense minister found will initiate the solar flare to take down the grid. They don't want any of us to survive.

fricking lizards man.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67906 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

GeauxxxTigers23




I'm adding this to our list of items to peddle in our future smuggling business.
This post was edited on 1/7/14 at 9:11 am
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34909 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:12 am to
Can't beat wood heat. Them ions are one of life's simple pleasures. And it is comforting to have the wood under the shed, and warmth independent of any grid problems.

I don't have a problem with better stoves, though more expensive stoves will hurt the poor country folk. I do like the smoky atmospheric effects on the landscape. Pretty. But I might die sucking it in.

The whole AGW meme is just another example of the Prog/Authoritarian 'never let a good crisis go to waste' MO. There will be Natural and Man made events that occur in the next half century that will make today's GW debate...moot.

Whatever.
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:14 am to
I heard that a new company has developed a clean green burning fuel that is actually good for the environment called soylent red, don't remember the company name though
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:15 am to
quote:

I'm adding this to our list of items to peddle in our future smuggling business.


I'll make a note.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67906 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I'll make a note.



looks like a solid product vid demo
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:24 am to
It does look like a pretty cool camping tool. My boys just joined the cub scouts so I'm gonna need one.

I hope they don't turn gay.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7178 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:26 am to
"mean frick, can we disband this group of morons already ?"

No, we have to wait until 2016 at the earliest. But elections don't matter because there is "no difference" between the two parties. Or so I am told ....
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90602 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:27 am to
The EPA needs to go. The problem with them and other similar departments is once they run out of sensible things to regulate they find stupid shite to go after in order to keep their full funding and their jobs. Its not about the environment anymore its about them finding shite to do
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146732 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I'm adding this to our list of items to peddle in our future smuggling business.


You better add horses because NY is starting the trend to ban them to. Also add amish like buggies to the list.



Full coached ones with bullet proofed steel extra $$$$

Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Fine particulate pollution is made up of solid particles and liquid droplets that measure 2.5 micrometers in diameter or less. The EPA currently certifies non-catalytic wood stoves if they produce less than 7.5 grams of fine particulate per hour.


Seems to me the emissions would depend on the wood you're burning, how dry it is, and the temp you're maintaining. There's no smoke coming out my chimney with a hot hickory fire with well-seasoned wood. Wet wood on coals smokes like crazy. Am I being overly simple here?

I'd spend the extra bucks to get a catalytic stove. I've got a 22 y/o Jotul that will run you out of the room and burn all night on an armful of hardwood with the catalyst engaged.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:32 am to
I wonder what will happen to the two new breasts installed by the bridge in Port Allen if this goes through. Aren't those for a new wood pellet plant?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67906 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:33 am to
quote:

You better add horses

yeah they are going straight to the ban, not even trying an interim restriction with a 15 day waiting period
Posted by hawkster
Member since Aug 2010
6229 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:33 am to
Can they just find a way to tax fire?
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Can't beat wood heat. Them ions are one of life's simple pleasures. And it is comforting to have the wood under the shed, and warmth independent of any grid problems.


I agree totally. Add in a propane powered generator and you're ready for just about anything except tornadoes. Nothing says "home" more than coming up a driveway smelling a good oak log burning in the stove.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80151 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:38 am to
They are claiming it is for health benefits... But my question is

quote:

"When these standards are fully implemented, EPA estimates that for every dollar spent to comply with these standards, the American public will see between $118 and $267 in health benefits,"


Where the frick do you even come up with this number???
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram