Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

New Constitutional amendment: limit Congress

Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:32 am
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39941 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:32 am
Limit congress from working more than 35 days per year. Period.

Only exception would be to call congress together for war response or declarations.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:46 am to
Their staff does the heavy lifting. The president and his implementation of law is where the limits should be placed.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95333 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Their staff does the heavy lifting. The president and his implementation of law is where the limits should be placed.



Then cut the funding for their staff as part of it, especially since they'll only be up and running for part of the year.


The general idea should be to ensure that Congress is a public service and NOT a career, much like the idea behind the New Hampshire legislature.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:54 am to
I'm starting to come around on term limits
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39941 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:56 am to
Maybe that too, but I'm talking about just forcing congress to deal with only MAJOR items like a budget.

Oh and no staffs.

And bills limited to 20 pages for the entire bill.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24741 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:56 am to
I would rather just force them to live in their districts 11 months of the year. They can come to Washington for a week or two here and there, but let's let them live in their home districts year-round. They can vote remotely.

This way, they would have to listen to their constituents more and hopefully listen less to their party leadership and lobbyists.

Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 10:59 am to
quote:


This way, they would have to listen to their constituents more and hopefully listen less to their party leadership and lobbyists.

Yeah but what about all the fundraising and spending time on K street the other 11 months?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51580 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Maybe that too, but I'm talking about just forcing congress to deal with only MAJOR items like a budget.

Oh and no staffs.

And bills limited to 20 pages for the entire bill.


And their pay is the same as the US mean wage (adjusted annually at the beginning of the fiscal year).
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Limit congress from working more than 35 days per year. Period.

Only exception would be to call congress together for war response or declarations.


quote:

Oh and no staffs.

And bills limited to 20 pages for the entire bill.



And their travel options shall be limited to horse-drawn carriages
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39941 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

And their travel options shall be limited to horse-drawn carriages


Hey the feminists are gonna be with me on this one... you know how hard it will be to conduct a war on women with this plan in place?
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 12:55 pm to
I agree with the sentiment behind this, but fear it would lead to even more "legislation" by executive fiat.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Limit congress from working more than 35 days per year. Period.


No.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram