Started By
Message
locked post

ObamaCare/FDA Requiring Vending Machines to Display Calorie Counts

Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:24 am
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:24 am
LINK /

On the one hand, the average American is increasingly being characterized as an unhealthy, low-information type who could benefit from greater disclosures regarding the food he intakes. Over time, constantly seeing calorie counts may allow him to develop a better barometer for just how healthy or unhealthy certain foods may be, just as the stock investor, after looking through the valuations of scores of companies, eventually acquires a sense for which multiples are low and which are high. For the junk food eater, this is almost definitely an acquired skill. By encouraging healthier eating, we could potentially save costs, and Americans are quick to note when traveling overseas how comparatively obese and unhealthy their countryfolk are, presumably indicative of some recognition of the problem at hand.

quote:

The cost will be high for vending machine operators to implement the changes, but the government has a bigger consideration. By the FDA's reckoning if only 0.2% of obese adults reduce their calorie intake by a moderate amount, then the program will save $24M a year in annual health care costs.


LINK

On the other hand, why must everything come at the hand of government with this administration? Why not encourage vendors to begin incorporating calorie counts? The vending machine market is likely controlled by just a handful of major operators. Convincing even one to begin adopting these counts certainly wouldn't go unnoticed, and would likely pose a competitive threat to rivals, encouraging them, too, to begin incorporating this technology. A smaller operator may also have an opportunity to be a first-mover and thereby create increased business for itself or even convince health advocacy organizations to make financial contributions or give it positive press. It seems at least attempting a free market solution first would be the most reasonable option here.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 8:25 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123908 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:27 am to
quote:

ObamaCare/FDA Requiring Vending Machines to Display Calorie Counts
I don't really have a problem with that.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:30 am to
I don't have a problem with the idea. I have a problem with forcing it upon private business owners when it, by itself, is not a threat to public safety.

We should encourage an environment where food companies take it upon themselves to increase transparency, not harbor disdain by forcing expensive requirements upon them.
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4281 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I don't really have a problem with that.


The individual items in the vending machine already have the calorie counts on them. This just feels vaguely insulting. I know I'm getting a candy bar not a celery stick, stop telling me my Snickers is the equivalent of 1/2 a meal.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30191 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Over time, constantly seeing calorie counts may allow him to develop a better barometer for just how healthy or unhealthy certain foods may be


Yes, because Joe Shmo will definitely not buy that snickers bar if he knows the calories.

People know vending machine items are generally pretty unhealthy. Knowing the calorie content before purchase, I don't believe, is going to change much.

ETA:
quote:

The individual items in the vending machine already have the calorie counts on them. This just feels vaguely insulting. I know I'm getting a candy bar not a celery stick, stop telling me my Snickers is the equivalent of 1/2 a meal.


We're too stupid to choose our own healthcare and apparently too stupid to realize a candy bar is extremely unhealthy. Thank God the US government is here to tell me all these things, otherwise I'd be screwed.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 8:37 am
Posted by TigerTattle
Out of Town
Member since Sep 2007
6623 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:36 am to
quote:

It seems at least attempting a free market solution first would be the most reasonable option


I agree with this.

Regardless, the only people who will read the calorie counts will be the people who CARE about their weight/nutrition.

Americans are notoriously self-indulgent about their "snacks." That's why we're so fat.

JMO based on personal experience I'm working on losing about 15 lbs.
Posted by wheelr
Member since Jul 2012
5147 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:48 am to
quote:

I don't really have a problem with that.


And after that? And then after that?

It's a damn vending machine. If you don't know those Ding-Dongs or bag of chips are unhealthy you have bigger problems than a few extra calories.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:01 am to
I would imagine more vending machine products are bought over the counter in stores. Why shouldn't the info have to be displayed for them also.

Maybe start little and get bigger? The foot in the door syndrome?
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30191 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:14 am to
The nutrition info is already on the packaging of any food you can buy. Not to mention all of the knowledge you have your fingertips via the internet to research nutrition of your diet.

This is just another ridiculous action that takes the responsibility off the individual and places it on someone else.

It's like people can't do shite for themselves anymore. Having the facts on the God damn wrapper isn't enough?

I'm probably making a way bigger deal out of this than it needs to be, but it chaps my arse everytime I see measures being taken that takes responsibility out of an individuals hands and puts the onus of responsibility on someone other than THAT individual.

People in this country aren't overweight because they are uninformed. It's because they are lazy and/or don't give a shite.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 9:15 am
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48352 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:15 am to
Big FedGov wants to control your lives and control the private economy. It's the key to power for those who advocate massive, intrusive Big FedGov.
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:16 am to
Sad
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21568 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:55 am to
Can't you buy cookies, snack cakes, and potato chips with food stamps? If you can be obese on the tax payer's dime then why go through the trouble to have calorie counts on vending machines.
Posted by Jimbeaux28
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
4051 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:30 am to
Just another thing for me to ignore.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84857 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:31 am to
you people will literally bitch about anything
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:38 am to
quote:

you people will literally bitch about anything


Just trying to get it all in before it becomes illegal to bitch about the government. Remember, abortion and gay marriage wasn't legal 50 years ago.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84857 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Just trying to get it all in before it becomes illegal to bitch about the government.


Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48352 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:41 am to
quote:

you people will literally bitch about anything




Isn't it FedGov that's doing the bitching? After all, FedGov started it because it was unhappy with the way that vending machines are managed. VENDING MACHINES? FedGov will literally "bitch" about and then "correct" ANYTHING. Isn't my assessment here quite accurate?

Isn't it FedGov that's poking it's intrusive nose into something that FedGov was never supposed to be involved in?

Is there literally NO ASPECT of our private lives or the private economy that FedGov will not try to control?

See, if you had a functioning brain, which you do not, you'd share our concerns with these FedGov issues.

Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:42 am to
What they should do is have a scale you step on and a laser that measures your height. If your BMI is too high, you can't order certain types of food. Right?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84857 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:43 am to
quote:

What they should do is have a scale you step on and a laser that measures your height. If your BMI is too high, you can't order certain types of food. Right?


okay so now giving people informed choices is just a step away from Snickers prohibition?

some of you really are lunatics
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57234 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Over time, constantly seeing calorie counts may allow him to develop a better barometer for just how healthy or unhealthy certain foods may be,
Huh? Calorie and other nutrition information is labeled on every package of every food sold in America already.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram