Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

LHSAA wants to censor the media

Posted on 12/23/13 at 2:20 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47477 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 2:20 pm
quote:

The Executive Committee also placed an item on the agenda that limits what coaches, players and other school officials may say to the media under the guise of integrity and ethics.

Item No. 23 states: "In an effort to ensure a relationship between (among) coaches, players and other school officials and the media, which will reflect and promote the highest standard of sportsmanship, integrity and ethics, it is expected that coaches, players and other school officials make an effort in their communications with the media to stress the positive displays of sportsmanship demonstrated by student-athletes, coaches, spectators and school officials involved in the contest."

That's a mouthful, but the rule, which on the surface harnesses free speech, would disallow anyone under the school' supervision to criticize game officials or comment about specific decisions of game officials. It calls for school officials to cooperate with the media in the interpretation and clarification of rules and other aspects of athletic competition.

The penalty for violation of this rule would be harsh. It states that any coach or player found in non-compliance will not be allowed to participate in the next scheduled contest, including LHSAA post-season games or matches. Subsequent violations would cause disqualification from coaching or playing in the sport for the balance of the sport's season.

The rule, if passed, would place a burden on the media to censor its own questions that may interpreted by the LHSAA as controversial to protect coaches and players from suffering the consequences of this mandate.


LINK
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26574 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 2:22 pm to
LHSAAIOOC
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40774 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 2:43 pm to
If that infringes on the second amendment, I don't see how it would hold up in court if anyone has a problem with it.
This post was edited on 12/23/13 at 2:49 pm
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

The rule, if passed, would place a burden on the media to censor its own questions that may interpreted by the LHSAA as controversial to protect coaches and players from suffering the consequences of this mandate.

Any reporter who censor's his questions should tear up his credentials.
Posted by TigerStripes06
SWLA
Member since Sep 2006
30032 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 2:49 pm to
How would they expect the reporters to ask the hard hitting questions about high school athletics?
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21652 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

he rule, if passed, would place a burden on the media to censor its own questions that may interpreted by the LHSAA as controversial to protect coaches and players from suffering the consequences of this mandate.


This is bullshite. It's not the media's responsibility to ask questions in a form that won't get coaches fined/suspended for their answers. It happens all the time in college/pro sports. It's severely frowned upon by pretty much all legitimate sports leagues to criticize officiating in the press. If the LHSAA passes this rule, it's up to the coaches to make sure they say "no comment" or whatever generic cliche they can think of when asked about officiating.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

This is bullshite. It's not the media's responsibility to ask questions in a form that won't get coaches fined/suspended for their answers. It happens all the time in college/pro sports. It's severely frowned upon by pretty much all legitimate sports leagues to criticize officiating in the press. If the LHSAA passes this rule, it's up to the coaches to make sure they say "no comment" or whatever generic cliche they can think of when asked about officiating.


IMO this is more about asking questions about the LHSAA to the coaches. They don't want to be criticized.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 3:38 pm to
They should censor BJ Guzzardo. Oh wait, this SOB doesn't say or do anything other than picking up a check and protecting the good ole boy network in the state.

Just can his arse and the LHSAA would be a better organization for the high schools in the state.

And if Henderson continues to protect this guy's arse, he should be canned also
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

And if Henderson continues to protect this guy's arse, he should be canned also


Henderson should already be canned. He has already proven his job is useless.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94846 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

That's a mouthful, but the rule, which on the surface harnesses free speech, would disallow anyone under the school' supervision to criticize game officials or comment about specific decisions of game officials. It calls for school officials to cooperate with the media in the interpretation and clarification of rules and other aspects of athletic competition.


So... it doesn't allow players, coaches, or school officials to say "The refs totally blew that one." at the least.

Does it also cover those same groups telling everyone possible that "The LHSAA looked like a monkey fricking a football when it came to the 9 football championships this year."?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram