Started By
Message
locked post

Federal Reserve Tools | Past and Present

Posted on 9/17/13 at 9:28 am
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5600 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 9:28 am
I think it's pretty obvious that the Fed has changed over the past decade, and the tools they used to use have changed as well. Previously, these are the tools that you will read in textbooks that the Federal Reserve used to dictate monetary policy.

1. Federal Funds Rate - Set a target to which short-term funding and lending is based off of.

2. Discount Window - Set a rate at which banks can borrow from the Fed, usually higher than market rates.

3. Open Market Operations - Buying and selling securities in the open market.

The discount window is now irrelevant and the other two have morphed their nature, and now we see the emergence of a new, very powerful policy tool of forward guidance. The new tools that should be written in textbooks are as follows:

1. Fed Funds Rate - Still the same as previously, but there is a difference. The Fed has been talking about implementing a fixed-rate, reverse repo facility in early 2014. What will this do? In the past Fed Funds rate have hovered around the Fed Funds target rate, recently much lower. What this will do is allow the Fed to reverse repo their balance sheet (essentially unlimited) at fixed rates on the market, essentially giving repo rates and essentially all short-term rates a floor. The bands around the target rate will be much lower.

2. Open Market Operations - Same as previously although the extent and magnitude they are currently used at was probably not expected when they put a trading desk on the 7th floor of the NY Fed. This is now an extremely powerful tool that can make the Fed the biggest market participant and affect not only domestic markets, but as we've seen recently ALL other markets as well.

3. Forward Guidance - Another way of looking at this is "Open Mouth Operations". This is actually the most powerful tool the Fed has currently judging by market reaction, specifically volatility. If the Fed says "rates will stay low till x" or "rates will stay low till x happens" the market reaction is incredible. They can use this many different ways now with their tools saying "we will buy x till x" or "we will use the repo facility till x" or vice versa. This has been the primary change recently in Fed tools and should be used a lot going forward. Other central banks have taken note, with the BOE and ECB both using forms of forward guidance in their recent statements. This will likely be the primary tool of central banks, because hell, you don't have to buy a damn thing as long as you convince the market of something. Just look at the ECB's OMT program, it hasn't spent a single euro but the market reaction to the announcement has been fantastic.

This is a new era of central banks, hopefully the next 10 years of the market will be less dictated by monetary policy than the previous 5 but who knows. All we know is the arsenal of tools is much more robust.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 9:33 am to
This really started to be noticeable for me during Greenspan's tenure. I mean CNBC would speculate on what they were going to do based off the size of his briefcase as he walked across the street. And as they speculated, markets moved. How ridiculous.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5600 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 9:39 am to
Very true, I forget what it's called 'Greenspan equation?', 'Greenspan formula'... whatever people used to guess if the Fed would raise or lower rates. It's not the Taylor rule, something related to Greenspan. This is going to bug me.

Regardless absolutely true, the difference is this is now institutionalized within Fed statements. The strongest form is time-dependent guidance "rates will stay lower till mid 2015", then data-dependent "rates will stay lower till inflation is 2%". I'm curious how they will morph this going forward.
Posted by TheDiesel
Phoenix
Member since Feb 2010
2608 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 9:43 am to

Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 10:02 am to
Greenspan Effect
Posted by Cmlsu5618
Destin, FL
Member since Sep 2010
3763 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 10:15 am to
I finished business/finance school about 1 1/2 YRS ago.

Rate manipulation & open mkt ops were surely discussed, but guidance through public pressers and releases were definitely in the books and described as a major tool used by the Fed.

In fact, I think the pendulum has swung far to much to the side of investors & institutions hanging on every word the FOMC puts out.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 10:19 am to
quote:

In fact, I think the pendulum has swung far to much to the side of investors & institutions hanging on every word the FOMC puts out.


I wouldn't necessarily say that. I would say that investing today (at least by consumers) is 95% emotion driven.
Posted by Cmlsu5618
Destin, FL
Member since Sep 2010
3763 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 10:42 am to
But do you feel you can argue that the market has not been driven particularly by the expectations of QE3, tapering, and the like?

Emotion is absolutely a larger piece of the pie for the purely amateur investor, but genenerally and as of late, the market has seemed to rely heavily on media's oversold positions on Fed statements.

JMO
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 10:50 am to
I agree with that. But when you said "investors" I automatically lump around 80% of people into the amateur category. They know just enough to feel confident but their skills are lacking. So that brings us to 2 distinct sides. Amateur investors and institutions.
Posted by Turkey_Creek_Tiger
Member since Dec 2012
12343 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 11:16 am to
quote:

This is a new era of central banks, hopefully the next 10 years of the market will be less dictated by monetary policy than the previous 5 but who knows.


I doubt it, but there is nothing wrong with optimism.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5600 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 11:29 am to
quote:

But do you feel you can argue that the market has not been driven particularly by the expectations of QE3, tapering, and the like?

Without a doubt it's affected by it, you essentially have a fund with an unlimited balance sheet and no repurcussions for loss that can operate with all primary dealers, large funds, and commercial banks.
quote:

, the market has seemed to rely heavily on media's oversold positions on Fed statements.

That's been happening since '09. Huge leveraged positions built up across a huge variety of asset classes based on the lowered volatility assumptions of easing. The EM carry trade was extremely attractive and REITs had damn near 32 years of duration on their balance sheets in April.

That was my point with central banks being less important in the next 10 years than previous 5, but be careful what you wish for. If you want markets to price in economics based on historical reactions to similar economic indicators you're looking at a huge crash in risk assets. And to the comment above about optimism, seeing as how the past 5 years had the most involvement of central banks globally in history, I don't think its being optimistic to just expect a slight mean reversion.

The big thing here isn't central bank action though, it's liqudiity. Dealer balance sheet usage is down 70% from the '07 highs, and regulation has caused most dealers to be unwilling to take risk to make markets. What should've been a 60bps sell-off due to tapering comments turned into an 100bp sell-off. All illiquid assets got smoked post tapering, espeically EM. Central bank action is an issue in the market, but its not the primary one. The primary one is that market liquidity is not the same as it used to be, and if regulation gets everything they want (ESPECIALLY the new gross repo exposure rules, holy frick if that happens) liquidity will be drying up for a long time.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Dealer balance sheet usage
I've never heard that term before. What does it mean?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 12:51 pm to
frick, I'll admit it.

I'm a BennyAndTheInkJets fanboy.

This post was edited on 9/17/13 at 12:54 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 1:00 pm to
Me, too....except when he goes all CAPS LOCK on me for being "witty."

LINK
Posted by Cmlsu5618
Destin, FL
Member since Sep 2010
3763 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 1:02 pm to




I forget you guys actually carry a sense of humor in the back pockets.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 1:03 pm to
You two are just presh.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5600 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

I've never heard that term before. What does it mean?

Dealers by structure are market makers, buying and selling securities by keeping an inventory. Within this inventory, risk is housed. Dealer balance sheet usage can mean a couple things, either just the pure amount of inventory they hold, or the amount of transactions done over the course of a day/week/month that are not immediately 'brokered'. Basically dealers are not doing their job as dealers anymore because of new capital requirements for banks, new risk ratios, and other new regulation that has caused banks to not warehouse risk anymore.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing from one persepective. Banks are retreating globally from different asset classes. This creates a large amount of opportunities for private funds and investors. So with less liquidity comes the opportunity for higher returns in some areas.
Posted by slutiger5
Parroquias de Florida
Member since May 2007
10634 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 1:50 pm to
Im reading these post 15 times before i understand the first sentence.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 9/17/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Im reading these post 15 times before i understand the first sentence.


Hey little buddy. One day you'll get it. I went to SLU and I get it. So there is still hope. Don't give up yet.
Posted by Blakely Bimbo
Member since Dec 2010
1183 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:04 am to
The Fed has another tool, the media tools like Jon Hilsenrath, Greg Ip and Steve Liesman. They float ideas to see market reaction. Hilsenrath floated the 2016 "dilemma" the other day.

We are in uncharted territory with monetary policy that has never been attempted before. Could be positively brilliant, but I don't know if anyone has any idea how this ends.

The Russell 2000 is up almost 50% in 10 months. The PE is something like 83 and last year it was 33. Bloomberg TV showed a chart this am that money supply is up 57% under Bernanke.

There will be another financial crisis; just a matter of when. When that happens, we might see the Treasury do something creative like issue bonds specifically for the FED. It will be a signal that we are SOL, but I WOULD NOT be short stocks, when that happens. If you ever hear one of the FED's mouthpieces float that idea... do your own due diligence.

But, you will say the FED is limited to how much they can buy? Rules change. We learned that in 2008. The FED is the greatest Central Bank in the world, but as always, policy works until it doesn't.
This post was edited on 9/18/13 at 8:17 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram