Started By
Message
locked post

Just watched Les Miserables (2012 version)..

Posted on 9/4/13 at 3:22 pm
Posted by MrPackSix
Lakeview/God's Country
Member since Oct 2009
8220 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 3:22 pm
A shame it took me this long to watch it

Liked the Neeson/Rush version as well but this one definetly held its own. Hathaway and Crowe had great performances. Singing was pretty good considering musicals aren't any of the actors' specialty

Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27875 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 3:31 pm to
Hugh Jackman was born to sing and dance in this kind of thing.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16319 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 3:41 pm to
Eponine
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 3:58 pm to
There was so much singing

So much god damn singing.
Posted by Cajun Revolution
Member since Apr 2009
44671 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

There was so much singing

So much god damn singing.


I watched about 10 minutes.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Hathaway

I thought she was passable at best. Compare her performance to Ruthie Henshall or Patti LuPone.

They were doing it live while Hathaway and the rest of the movie cast had a great deal of electronic assistance.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

They were doing it live while Hathaway and the rest of the movie cast had a great deal of electronic assistance.



I thought Hathaway's performance was slightly overrated, but the whole cast of the movie sang live.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

but the whole cast of the movie sang live

That was little more than a gimmick

quote:

but, as director Phyllida Lloyd later explained, the movie only included some of those vocals. Much of what audiences heard was a “blend” of live and re-recorded singing. Considering the sleek design of this Les Misérables—and the imperfect vocal abilities of Amanda Seyfried—it will not be surprising if the live vocals are partly masked with post-production mixing and overdubbing.
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:42 pm to
I made it an hour. It was just unbearable after that.

If it had been like other musicals with songs intermixed with the dialog that would have been fine.

But what I saw was 95 percent singing and 5 percent dialog.

I couldn't imagine going to see it at the theater. If I had it would have been the only movie I ever walked out on.

I'm not saying it was bad. There was just much damn singing.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:43 pm to
That doesn't actually prove that the live versions in Les Mis weren't used, it proves that someone else thinks they weren't.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

but the whole cast of the movie sang live That was little more than a gimmick

That's true. The cast and producers made a huge deal out of singing live only to have the truth come out that it wasn't as live as they were putting forth.

Ruthie Henshall, now she did it live.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

That doesn't actually prove that the live versions in Les Mis weren't used, it proves that someone else thinks they weren't.

The director is telling you only a small amount of live singing was used and the rest was a blend.

Even the so-called live crap was enhanced electronically.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

The director is telling you only a small amount of live singing was used and the rest was a blend.


I willing to be corrected. Link?
Posted by Michael T. Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2004
8243 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 5:47 pm to
Samantha Barks is fiya.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36115 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 5:52 pm to
I thought Hathaway was quite good and Jackman inconsistently good. Crowe was intermittently terrible as a singer (I was surprised to hear he supposedly did a lot of singing earlier in his career).
Posted by Tigris
Mexican Home
Member since Jul 2005
12358 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

There was so much singing

So much god damn singing.


Yep. When they started singing simple conversational phrases I knew I was facked. It was good for what it was but that is really not my thing. I felt every one of the 158 minutes as they crawled past.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28340 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 7:03 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/23/21 at 11:15 pm
Posted by Tigris
Mexican Home
Member since Jul 2005
12358 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 7:06 pm to
double post
This post was edited on 9/4/13 at 7:26 pm
Posted by flvelo12
Palm Harbor, Florida
Member since Jan 2012
3319 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 8:21 pm to
In my humble opinion, I thought it was great. Saw live show in London years ago, great story and music.

Interesting Film Trivia
Posted by prostyleoffensetime
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2009
11437 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

I made it an hour. It was just unbearable after that.


I got about an hour in and was like wtf, but then I was like I've made it this far, I'm watching this shite to the end.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram