Started By
Message
locked post

ESPN's Chris Low predicts LSU in Sugar Bowl

Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:06 pm
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:06 pm
LINK


It just took one game for LSU to make an impression on the media and LSU's just getting started. LSU will continue to improve. California might be their destination, not New Orleans.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
55979 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:08 pm to
It is damn early for this kind of talk, but I would consider either an exceptional year....
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17314 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:09 pm to
Low does this every week. It literally means nothing.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94368 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:10 pm to
lol they'll never give up on Alabama. Regardless of the fact they looked like garbage.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52530 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

It just took one game for LSU to make an impression on the media and LSU's just getting started. LSU will continue to improve. California might be their destination, not New Orleans.

just stop
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Low does this every week. It literally means nothing.



This is a bold prediction considering LSU's schedule. Low must have saw something he really liked.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98133 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

lol they'll never give up on Alabama. Regardless of the fact they looked like garbage.


If they don't find some offensive linemen, they're looking at three losses.
Posted by tiger11
Houston
Member since Mar 2004
3272 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

If they don't find some offensive linemen, they're looking at three losses


Shhh!!!! Cam Rob may be reading this!!
Posted by siliconvalleytiger
Bay Area, CA
Member since Apr 2004
31157 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:12 pm to
I predict more than half of Lowe's predictions are incorrect.
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

If they don't find some offensive linemen, they're looking at three losses.




You can bet the media saw this. Yesterday LSU's offensive line looked far superior to Alabama's, Bama QB was sacked like 6 times. What an improvement for LSU over last year when they had a tough time keeping Mett off the ground. Now it appears Alabama has a problem not LSU problem. Mett and this off.line have greatly improved over last year.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32453 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:27 pm to
The Sugar would be schweet!
Posted by Captain Lafitte
Barataria Bay
Member since Nov 2012
6377 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:59 pm to
Low expectations?
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26614 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

The Sugar would be schweet!


I'd take the Sugar if our one loss was close to UF or UGA. I do not want to lose to Manziel nor Alabama because I hate them both. Well I don't really hate Alabama, I hate the media acting as if they are invincible and the fans with the 50 yard line, & 3 outta 4 crap.
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

I'd take the Sugar if our one loss was close to UF or UGA. I do not want to lose to Manziel nor Alabama because I hate them both. Well I don't really hate Alabama, I hate the media acting as if they are invincible and the fans with the 50 yard line, & 3 outta 4 crap.


Several fans are commenting below ESPN's Chris Lows prediction post that Alabama could lose to LSU and the Aggies.
Posted by tigerprl
DFW
Member since Dec 2010
1278 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:18 pm to
Give any good QB and recivers time to make read, run route, and they will make the catch. Met has the tools but he can't use them if he is on his butt, rushed, or not given time to set up and throw as in last year. So far looks like diffenet ball game even with the loss of Josh Willford who i looked forward to seeing play this year. No OL no success.
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
9894 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

3 outta 4 crap


should be 2 out of 3. The mulligan should have never happened. The media would have never allowed it to be discussed had the roles been reversed.
Posted by tigerd60
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Jan 2013
159 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:28 pm to
Hmmm...saw all that one game into the season? I don't listen to any of the so called "experts".
Now if he would say this sometime between mid season and the end of the reg season it could have some truth to it,but not right now.
Posted by LSU Jax
Gator Country Hell
Member since Sep 2006
8836 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

should be 2 out of 3. The mulligan should have never happened.


Agreed and here's what kills me about it. It would actually be 2 out of 4 and there would be NO dynasty talk. Amazing. All we hear about is their dynasty when they shouldn't even have been in the game against us. THAT'S what sticks in my craw about it.
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:24 pm to
LINK /



"based on the first week alone should LSU and South Carolina be the favorites, they were both impressive"









This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 1:06 pm
Posted by The Detroit Lions
English Turn, LSU Alum
Member since Feb 2010
1442 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:40 pm to
Jumping on this bandwagon is the cool thing to do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram