- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ESPN's Chris Low predicts LSU in Sugar Bowl
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:06 pm
LINK
It just took one game for LSU to make an impression on the media and LSU's just getting started. LSU will continue to improve. California might be their destination, not New Orleans.
It just took one game for LSU to make an impression on the media and LSU's just getting started. LSU will continue to improve. California might be their destination, not New Orleans.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:08 pm to TrueTigerTale
It is damn early for this kind of talk, but I would consider either an exceptional year....
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:09 pm to TrueTigerTale
Low does this every week. It literally means nothing.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:10 pm to TrueTigerTale
lol they'll never give up on Alabama. Regardless of the fact they looked like garbage.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:16 pm to TrueTigerTale
quote:just stop
It just took one game for LSU to make an impression on the media and LSU's just getting started. LSU will continue to improve. California might be their destination, not New Orleans.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:24 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
Low does this every week. It literally means nothing.
This is a bold prediction considering LSU's schedule. Low must have saw something he really liked.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 5:36 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
lol they'll never give up on Alabama. Regardless of the fact they looked like garbage.
If they don't find some offensive linemen, they're looking at three losses.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:00 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
If they don't find some offensive linemen, they're looking at three losses
Shhh!!!! Cam Rob may be reading this!!
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:12 pm to TrueTigerTale
I predict more than half of Lowe's predictions are incorrect.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:14 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
If they don't find some offensive linemen, they're looking at three losses.
You can bet the media saw this. Yesterday LSU's offensive line looked far superior to Alabama's, Bama QB was sacked like 6 times. What an improvement for LSU over last year when they had a tough time keeping Mett off the ground. Now it appears Alabama has a problem not LSU problem. Mett and this off.line have greatly improved over last year.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 6:27 pm to TrueTigerTale
The Sugar would be schweet!
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:00 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
The Sugar would be schweet!
I'd take the Sugar if our one loss was close to UF or UGA. I do not want to lose to Manziel nor Alabama because I hate them both. Well I don't really hate Alabama, I hate the media acting as if they are invincible and the fans with the 50 yard line, & 3 outta 4 crap.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:14 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
I'd take the Sugar if our one loss was close to UF or UGA. I do not want to lose to Manziel nor Alabama because I hate them both. Well I don't really hate Alabama, I hate the media acting as if they are invincible and the fans with the 50 yard line, & 3 outta 4 crap.
Several fans are commenting below ESPN's Chris Lows prediction post that Alabama could lose to LSU and the Aggies.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:18 pm to Datbayoubengal
Give any good QB and recivers time to make read, run route, and they will make the catch. Met has the tools but he can't use them if he is on his butt, rushed, or not given time to set up and throw as in last year. So far looks like diffenet ball game even with the loss of Josh Willford who i looked forward to seeing play this year. No OL no success.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:25 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
3 outta 4 crap
should be 2 out of 3. The mulligan should have never happened. The media would have never allowed it to be discussed had the roles been reversed.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:28 pm to TrueTigerTale
Hmmm...saw all that one game into the season? I don't listen to any of the so called "experts".
Now if he would say this sometime between mid season and the end of the reg season it could have some truth to it,but not right now.
Now if he would say this sometime between mid season and the end of the reg season it could have some truth to it,but not right now.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 7:59 pm to shoelessjoe
quote:
should be 2 out of 3. The mulligan should have never happened.
Agreed and here's what kills me about it. It would actually be 2 out of 4 and there would be NO dynasty talk. Amazing. All we hear about is their dynasty when they shouldn't even have been in the game against us. THAT'S what sticks in my craw about it.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:40 pm to TrueTigerTale
Jumping on this bandwagon is the cool thing to do.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News