Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit | Page 2 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
dreaux
LSU Fan
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
38372 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


No way. To short for the oline.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
PHXTigers
LSU Fan
Arizona
Member since Dec 2007
745 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


(no message)


This post was edited on 7/15 at 9:48 pm


Back to top
  Replies (0)
CP3LSU25
LSU Fan
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2009
36041 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


For the record we were all screaming when they wouldn't give him his 4th star.





Back to top
SteveLSU35
LSU Fan
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
11311 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


My issue with him was/is that with that great weight program in HS has he reached his athletic height? He's not the traditional long and lean end with crazy athleticism we normally take. I know the coaches at many schools love him and I hope he balls out of control for us.





Back to top
loopydj
LSU Fan
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2011
292 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit








Back to top
Dylan
LSU Fan
Bayou Barbary
Member since May 2009
2787 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


That dude's chest is massive.





Back to top
ezrulz
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2011
1094 posts
 Online 

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


Legs are like tree trunks as well. He will be very similar to Courtney Upshaw when all is said and done.





Back to top
doze4
LSU Fan
Baon Rouge LA
Member since Aug 2007
1066 posts

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit


Why isn't Neal listed as a commit on the main board ? Is he a junior ?





Back to top
Duckie
LSU Fan
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
21351 posts
 Online 

re: Some poster here called the Lewis Neal sleeper commit




Neal is a 13 kid.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top