Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In" | Page 16 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
SammyTiger
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
10182 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

I personally don't care. However, the individual states should be able to decide if they will allow (or recognize) them. Also, religious should not be forced to perform them even if legal.


I disagree with the notion states should be able to decide. There is a notion of protecting the minority in the nation. Civil rights weren't chosen state by state.

But i agree religious institutions shouldn't be forced to perform them. But i don't think that would be w problem. Look now. There is nothing against two people of different faiths being recognized as a married couple by the law. However, the various religions are still left to their own devises weather or not they will marry them. Straight couple get turned away by churches if they deem them unfit to wed each other.






Back to top
rbWarEagle
Auburn Fan
Member since Nov 2009
29396 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


Haven't read the whole thread, but I'd like to point out how massively irrelevant to human existence this issue is. Why does anyone really care? Bigotry? That's the only reason I can see why anyone would waste their time with this.

Homosexuality occurs in nature. We are part of nature. Some people are born with predisposition to homosexuality and you just happen to be one that wasn't. Get the frick over yourself is what I'd say.

Besides, marriage is an antiquated ritual that serves little to no purpose for our species. If monogamy had always taken place, humanity never would have made it this long.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
EST
LSU Fan
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
14479 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


Guess Who will not acknowledge the legitimacy of those same sex marriages?





Back to top
  Replies (0)
SDwhodat
Member since Apr 2007
1651 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


If people are going to govern in the arena at all, those same people should be able to decide the definition of marriage so long as all people get the same tangible benefits.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
ljhog
Arkansas Fan
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
10027 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

please explain to me how animals can be gay?

Had couple of dogs once that sho had some gay tendencies. So I guess that proves being gay can be a "natural" thing. Also proved one more thing. You can beat the gay out dey ass!






Back to top
  Replies (0)
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:


Well you're either blind or an idiot.


He's a blind idiot.







Back to top
  Replies (0)
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

. Anti-gay marriage seems so mean.


Why?








Back to top
  Replies (0)
beulahland
LSU Fan
Little D'arbonne
Member since Jan 2013
1751 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


against honosexual marriage





Back to top
  Replies (0)
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:


And I love the argument that being gay is not a natural thing... Then please explain to me how animals can be gay?


Animals are not "gay". What may appear to be acts of homosexuality are actually acts of dominance.







Back to top
  Replies (0)
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

People straight and gay, have sex for non reproductive purposes and it isn't all about themselves


However, a fertile heterosexual couple who have sex for non reproductive purposes still have the possibility of creating a child whereas, two homosexuals of the same sex who have sex for pleasure don't have to worry about creating a child.







Back to top
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:


A lot of financial advantages that they are not allowed to claim in certain circumstances... ie insurance


So it isn't about "love". It's really about "money".







Back to top
  Replies (0)
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:


Don't worry, that's what they do over here... They like to pick and choose what they are going to obey and the ones that they do obey, they like to bash those who don't


Whereas, anti religious amoral people like you don't have to choose what you are going to obey since you have no moral codes to choose from.










Back to top
  Replies (0)
Wolfhound45
LSU Fan
Member since Nov 2009
17573 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

Agreed...


Well played. Just not entirely accurate.

Mark 10:5,6







Back to top
  Replies (0)
DawgfaninCa
Georgia Fan
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
3868 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

What rights? Is there anything that me and my wife have that I cannot get with a friend through a contractual agreement? Seriously.


quote:

The right to call it a marriage. If it's so insignificant as semantics, why the refusal to let them participate?


When the union of you and your same sex partner even have the remote possibility of creating a child to ensure the survival of the human race then you can have the right to call your union a marriage.









Back to top
  Replies (0)
dominustd
LSU Fan
La.
Member since Oct 2012
1324 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

Federal/states rights for couples regarding tax laws and property is one thing, but the institution of marriage is sacred under God.

Fight for the rights of law, not religion, but no! Liberals want to deny the religious their rightful honor. Period!


I posted this in another thread and I'll repeat.

The institution of marriage is sacred and the Vegas quickies and the like are bullcrap as well. They mock the ceremony.

Civil unions, Common Law marriages, fine in order to reap the state/federal benefits.

The whole gay marriage front is nothing but anti-religious bigotry. Nothing more.







Back to top
Toddy
Ole Miss Fan
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
20625 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

The whole gay marriage front is nothing but anti-religious bigotry. Nothing more.



There are plenty of churches that would love to bless same sex unions now. So yes, I can see where it would be anti-religious bigotry not allowing these churches to marry same sex couples.






Back to top
SammyTiger
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
10182 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

However, a fertile heterosexual couple who have sex for non reproductive purposes still have the possibility of creating a child whereas, two homosexuals of the same sex who have sex for pleasure don't have to worry about creating a child.


NOt if they have had a hysterectomy, had their tubes tide, had a vasectomy. Wear a condom, or take the pill, or both. Good thing none of that is legal.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
dominustd
LSU Fan
La.
Member since Oct 2012
1324 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


They are not really churches fwiw. But you don't get it.





Back to top
GumboPot
LSU Fan
Saints Fan
Member since Mar 2009
24903 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

There are plenty of churches that would love to bless same sex unions now.


Bless? What does that mean?

Why can't these churches perform SSMs despite the government?








Back to top
  Replies (0)
SammyTiger
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
10182 posts

re: Pro Natural (Anti-Gay) Marriage "Check-In"


quote:

They are not really churches fwiw. But you don't get it.


I don't think the US government can make that distinction. Sorta 1st amendment stuff.

that being said my synagogue offers same sex marriages. How are laws picking catholic or traditional christian definitions of Marriage not against the 1st amendment.






Back to top


Back to top