| Posted by | Message |
jimithing11 
Texas Fan
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
13438 posts
| Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:05 pm)
LINK
Looks like Jets want similar package to Harvin, first, third and seventh. Bucs want to ship a 2014 first rounder. Something has to give
|
| Back to top | Share on  |
Na Mean
This is me yo.
Member since Mar 2013
2419 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:06 pm to jimithing11)
Revis to Philly
|
| Back to top | |
jimithing11
Texas Fan
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
13438 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:07 pm to Na Mean)
quote:
Revis to Philly
You honestly think Chip is giving up No. 4 overall for Revis' rapey knee cap? 
|
| Back to top | |
GeauxAggie972 
LSU Fan
CDUB71323 lives on
Member since Aug 2009
11063 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:07 pm to jimithing11)
Why wouldn't San Fran jump at that?
|
| Back to top | |
Na Mean
This is me yo.
Member since Mar 2013
2419 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:08 pm to GeauxAggie972)
San Fran doesn't need him, IMO. He would be icing on the cake.
|
| Back to top | |
jimithing11
Texas Fan
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
13438 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:08 pm to GeauxAggie972)
quote:
Why wouldn't San Fran jump at that?
I guess they don't think he's worth that much. Much like the Pats, who would never give that much up for one player
|
| Back to top | |
GeauxAggie972
LSU Fan
CDUB71323 lives on
Member since Aug 2009
11063 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:09 pm to Na Mean)
quote:
San Fran doesn't need him
Right, but when they have 16 or so picks in this draft, might as well get rid of some of them. They really aren't going to bring 16 rookies onto their roster
|
| Back to top | |
jimithing11
Texas Fan
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
13438 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:12 pm to GeauxAggie972)
quote:
Right, but when they have 16 or so picks in this draft, might as well get rid of some of them. They really aren't going to bring 16 rookies onto their roster
No, but that's when you stock pile for 2014 draft or put together a few second or third round picks and move back into the first round or something
|
| Back to top | |
Na Mean
This is me yo.
Member since Mar 2013
2419 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:13 pm to jimithing11)
Not to mention the money they would have to pay Revis, unless they just rent him for this season.
|
| Back to top | |
Mephistopheles
LSU Fan
Iowa City
Member since Aug 2007
2663 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:14 pm to GeauxAggie972)
SF already have one of the best defenses in the league. No need to spend 15 mil a year on one player.
The jets should shut the frick up and trade him. Revis' contract demands make this a buyers market. Hardly anyone can afford him.
|
| Back to top | |
wildtigercat93
LSU Fan
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2011
25885 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:14 pm to jimithing11)
Smarter move would be to trade current picks for future picks and cash in whenever you need too
|
| Back to top | |
Draconian Sanctions
LSU Fan
San Francisco 49ers Fan
Member since Oct 2008
28238 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:16 pm to GeauxAggie972)
quote:
Why wouldn't San Fran jump at that?
give up two good picks for a player coming off a major injury and only 1 year left on his deal who will demand a new one that will eat up a massive chunk in our salary cap? No thanks.
|
| Back to top | |
Draconian Sanctions
LSU Fan
San Francisco 49ers Fan
Member since Oct 2008
28238 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:17 pm to wildtigercat93)
quote:
Smarter move would be to trade current picks for future picks and cash in whenever you need too
exactly, plus players on their rookie deals are cheap labor in the NFL. We're going to have to pay Kaep after next season so a few current starters will have to go. Turn this quantity of picks into a smaller number of higher quality picks and you can fill those holes and not miss a beat.
This post was edited on 3/13 at 9:18 pm
|
| Back to top | |
alabamabuckeye 
Alabama Fan
Snooki want Smush Smush
Member since Jun 2010
12727 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:23 pm to Draconian Sanctions)
1. Find a team who wants to move up a few spots, trade.
2. Trade first round pick with Jets for Revis
3. ???
4. Profit
|
| Back to top | |
Draconian Sanctions
LSU Fan
San Francisco 49ers Fan
Member since Oct 2008
28238 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:30 pm to alabamabuckeye)
it's not that we don't want Revis, we don;t want the cap number he represents at that position. Managing resources.
|
| Back to top | |
Patrick_Bateman 
USA Fan
Member since Jan 2012
5082 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:47 pm to jimithing11)
quote:
You honestly think Chip is giving up No. 4 overall for Revis' rapey knee cap?
To answer that question, no.
But I don't see why not. Sure, a good player can be gotten at #4 overall. But the league's best CB is only drafted once every six years or so. [Assuming that Revis will return to pre-injury form]
This post was edited on 3/13 at 9:48 pm
|
| Back to top | |
wildtigercat93
LSU Fan
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2011
25885 posts
| re: Revis trade held up by Buccaneers' first-round pick (Posted on 3/13/13 at 9:50 pm to Patrick_Bateman)
You also have to add in the huge chunk of salary cap he would occupy. If your rebuilding like the Eagles, youll probably be better long term getting that player in the draft on a dirt cheap contract and being able to sign other good players than you would having Revis on your team but not really winning anything because the res of the team is not up to par
|
| Back to top | |
