- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
why did we trade Jack again?
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:21 am
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:21 am
He was our most consistent player last year, and we trade him for a pack a number 2 pencils
This post was edited on 2/23/13 at 12:33 am
7
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:30 am to fightingtigers98
quote:
He was our most consistent player last year, and we trade him for a back a number 2 pencils
I think I like your question but you are way too young to be posting this drunk.
This post was edited on 2/23/13 at 12:31 am
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:38 am to fightingtigers98
because gravy will cary us to the promise land
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:40 am to fightingtigers98
We needed to clear his cap space to take on Lopez.
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:46 am to fightingtigers98
I rememebrr a Rumor was that he and EJ didn't get a along in Nola. Which is why I was surprised that the Warriors were thinking about making the trade.
Posted on 2/23/13 at 12:50 am to 504hornets
hey whats the espn insider username and pass words again?
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:31 am to fightingtigers98
Because we had to free up playing time for Rivers to tear the league up
Duh
Duh
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:38 am to fightingtigers98
quote:
why did we trade Jack again?
it's a rebuild...why did we not re-sign west?
...we could have stayed with those guys and be stuck in mediocrity, or move on and try to achieve something great.
good players. great guys. no need to stick with good 30+ year olds in a rebuild when you're a lottery team...unless they're superstars.
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:44 am to drake20
quote:All that stuff sounds so great
...we could have stayed with those guys and be stuck in mediocrity, or move on and try to achieve something great.
I'm just really not sure how much truth is there
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:44 am to drake20
I thought 100% after the year Jack had, and his favorable contract, that they would no doubt move him.
But, I didn't think they'd move him for literally nothing. Blah, blah freed up cap space to sign Lopez.
Jack was worth a pick in the 20s. Worst move Dell's made since he's been here - and that's a somewhat compliment to Dell
But, I didn't think they'd move him for literally nothing. Blah, blah freed up cap space to sign Lopez.
Jack was worth a pick in the 20s. Worst move Dell's made since he's been here - and that's a somewhat compliment to Dell
This post was edited on 2/23/13 at 1:46 am
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:45 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:I have 58 million dollars that disagree with that
Worst move Dell's made since he's been here
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:46 am to danman6336
Good for you.
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:52 am to danman6336
quote:
All that stuff sounds so great
I'm just really not sure how much truth is there
please enlighten me...we'd still be a bad team with much less financial flexibility.
make a point.
This post was edited on 2/23/13 at 1:53 am
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:55 am to drake20
4 years, 20 million isn't a bad deal for someone who would be arguably the best 6th man in the league
there's my point
there's my point
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:56 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
I thought 100% after the year Jack had, and his favorable contract, that they would no doubt move him.
But, I didn't think they'd move him for literally nothing. Blah, blah freed up cap space to sign Lopez.
Jack was worth a pick in the 20s. Worst move Dell's made since he's been here - and that's a somewhat compliment to Dell
i don't disagree with you there....I thought moving on from him was a good move, but i was expecting more in return, too.
the whole thing is ridiculous, because the situation worked out great for us. Vasquez has been more than what anyone had hoped for.
Jack's a good player. Vasquez is better, especially all things considered. People overreacting to one bad shot. The ball slipped out of his hands.
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:01 am to danman6336
quote:
4 years, 20 million isn't a bad deal for someone who would be arguably the best 6th man in the league
there's my point
it would be a great deal for a team looking to get over the hump....we're a lottery team in a rebuild.
4 years til he's 33...no thanks. It would be a good contract for a couple years and then hurt the team's ability to get better when they're ready to add the type of player we're talking about.
he would probably still be the starter if he was here....that would not be a good thing
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:05 am to drake20
it's definitely disappointing that we didn't get more from him, but trading him was the right move
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:11 am to drake20
quote:
the whole thing is ridiculous, because the situation worked out great for us. Vasquez has been more than what anyone had hoped for.
Why would have keeping Jack took away anything from Vasquez? Both would have been starting the majority of the season and played big minutes. Jack's minutes have gone to Rivers, Mason and Roberts.
quote:
Jack's a good player. Vasquez is better, especially all things considered
I don't know what you are considering. Cause he's younger, cheaper? They are a wash stats wise. We didn't gain anything by getting rid of Jack..
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:44 am to brmark70816
quote:
Both would have been starting the majority of the season and played big minutes.
I know...you prefer Vasquez at the two
quote:
I don't know what you are considering. Cause he's younger, cheaper?
yep.
...Jack had a good season last year on a bad team. before that, he wasn't anything special.
It's good that Vasquez and Rivers are getting the minutes they're getting. Why would we want Jack taking time from them.
This post was edited on 2/23/13 at 2:47 am
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News