Image height resizing no longer works? | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
UltimateHog
Arkansas Fan
Springfield, MO
Member since Dec 2011
32663 posts

Image height resizing no longer works?


Just like width=500 still works, I used to use height=500 all the time for images that are too verticle in length.

This no longer works.

Anyone know why?







Back to top
Share:
slackhouse
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2005
17883 posts

re: Image height resizing no longer works?





This post was edited on 2/4 at 6:58 am


Back to top
  Replies (0)
Chicken
USA Fan
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
6571 posts
 Online 

re: Image height resizing no longer works?


You don't need to use width and height anymore. We have max setting set to keep image from being too large.





Back to top
slackhouse
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2005
17883 posts

re: Image height resizing no longer works?




well played, Chicken. well played.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
When in Rome
USA Fan
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
25846 posts
 Online 

re: Image height resizing no longer works?


quote:

You don't need to use width and height anymore. We have max setting set to keep image from being too large.
mindblown.gif






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Hugo Stiglitz
USA Fan
Bitch, I'm From Louisiana
Member since Oct 2010
56808 posts

re: Image height resizing no longer works?


Does this mean we no longer have to meet the height and width requirements for avatar and sig images?

Because Rummy's and Ice Cold's signature images have exceeded those specifications for years.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
UltimateHog
Arkansas Fan
Springfield, MO
Member since Dec 2011
32663 posts

re: Image height resizing no longer works?








Back to top
  Replies (0)
JimMorrison
USA Fan
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
15278 posts

re: Image height resizing no longer works?


quote:

You don't need to use width and height anymore. We have max setting set to keep image from being too large.





eta: nice, we can still enhance images.



This post was edited on 2/4 at 12:45 pm


Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top