Started By
Message
locked post

How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA

Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:47 am
Posted by alexman
Member since Oct 2012
678 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:47 am
and how was it that these were all considered better
quote:

The Departed
Babel
Letters from Iwo Jima
Little Miss Sunshine
The Queen
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:51 am to
The Academy hates sci fi.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49488 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:52 am to
Best film of the decade, IMO.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76426 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:55 am to
Non-CGI heavy sci fi films never get the benefit over movies like those.

But Children of Men is among the greatest films ever made, and was AT LEAST as good as The Departed.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34447 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Letters from Iwo Jima
Little Miss Sunshine
All I've seen are these two. I thought Flags of our Fathers was a much better movie. Adam Beach should have gotten a nod for Best Supporting Actor.


That's all I've got to add to this thread.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20740 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:31 am to
I really need to give this movie another shot
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66373 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:35 am to
Should've been on there instead of babel
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37233 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:41 am to
quote:

How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA


The film itself was too heavy, too risky, and didn't play to oscar-worthy tropes.
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:43 am to
Children of Men was really amazing.

I heard Babel was heavy-handed and kinda stupid.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66373 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:45 am to
yep
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76426 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:50 am to
quote:

The film itself was too heavy, too risky, and didn't play to oscar-worthy tropes.
well said.

If it had laser guns and choreographed combat action scenes, it would have won state.
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

But Children of Men is among the greatest films ever made, and was AT LEAST as good as The Departed.

Evidently, I may be in the minority on this board, but I disagree completely with everything in that quote.

Children of Men was a good movie, and it probably deserved a nomination, but it wasn't much better (if at all) than the other nominees. I've seen all of them except Letters from Iwo Jima. I definitely prefer The Departed to CoM, and The Queen, Little Miss Sunshine, and Babel are all toss-ups IMO. I've only seen Babel once, but I really enjoyed it (if memory serves). All are good movies.
This post was edited on 1/24/13 at 12:29 pm
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34447 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 12:50 pm to
My mother keeps bugging me to watch the Queen. And I think I would like Babel. I like those movies like that that have big ensemble cast and intertwining stories. Like Grand Canyon, Amores Perros, etc. Not like Valentine's Day.
This post was edited on 1/24/13 at 12:51 pm
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36200 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 12:52 pm to
Babel and The Queen were the weakest of those films. The Queen was only good because Helen Mirren had such a great performance.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421245 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

The film itself was too heavy, too risky, and didn't play to oscar-worthy tropes.

what about Babel, though?

Babel fricking sucked a big cock AND it was risky and didn't really hit the "all american" nerve for an oscar
This post was edited on 1/24/13 at 1:05 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421245 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

I've only seen Babel once, but I really enjoyed it (if memory serves)

Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66373 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:13 pm to
FWIW, more people than not agree with me. LINK /
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421245 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:17 pm to
Babel is one of those movies that makes you think it's better than it is via presentation. you FEEL like this is supposed to be some profound statement, and people don't have the balls to be like "this fricking suuuuuuucks."

this happens on the flip side, too. Gigli was not nearly as bad as it was made out to be, yet critics were scared to be "that guy" who defended it. and i don't mean pulling an Armand Williams...i mean legitimately defending it
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66373 posts
Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Babel is one of those movies that makes you think it's better than it is via presentation. you FEEL like this is supposed to be some profound statement, and people don't have the balls to be like "this fricking suuuuuuucks."



wow

someone who understands
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram