| Posted by | Message |
alexman Member since Oct 2012 172 posts

| How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:47 am)
and how was it that these were all considered better
quote:
The Departed Babel Letters from Iwo Jima Little Miss Sunshine The Queen
|
| Back to top | Share on  |
Baloo  LSU Fan Formerly MDGeaux Member since Sep 2003 41100 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:51 am to alexman)
The Academy hates sci fi.
|
| Back to top | |
THRILLHO  New Orleans Saints Fan New Orleans, LA Member since Apr 2006 25313 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:52 am to alexman)
Best film of the decade, IMO.
|
| Back to top | |
Roaad  LSU Fan Bushrod Owns Member since Aug 2006 50398 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 10:55 am to alexman)
Non-CGI heavy sci fi films never get the benefit over movies like those. But Children of Men is among the greatest films ever made, and was AT LEAST as good as The Departed.
|
| Back to top | |
alajones  LSU Fan Barksdale AFB Member since Oct 2005 19229 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:22 am to alexman)
quote:
Letters from Iwo Jima Little Miss Sunshine
All I've seen are these two. I thought Flags of our Fathers was a much better movie. Adam Beach should have gotten a nod for Best Supporting Actor. That's all I've got to add to this thread.
|
| Back to top | |
etm512  LSU Fan Madisonville, LA Member since Aug 2005 11423 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:31 am to alexman)
I really need to give this movie another shot
|
| Back to top | |
Carson123987  LSU Fan Middle Court at The Rec Member since Jul 2011 23078 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:35 am to alexman)
Should've been on there instead of babel
|
| Back to top | |
Freauxzen  Wisc-Milwaukee Fan Louisiana Member since Feb 2006 16889 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:41 am to alexman)
quote:
How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA
The film itself was too heavy, too risky, and didn't play to oscar-worthy tropes.
|
| Back to top | |
Hoodoo Man  LSU Fan Sunshine Pumping most days. Member since Oct 2011 8903 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:43 am to alexman)
Children of Men was really amazing. I heard Babel was heavy-handed and kinda stupid.
|
| Back to top | |
Carson123987  LSU Fan Middle Court at The Rec Member since Jul 2011 23078 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:45 am to Hoodoo Man)
yep
|
| Back to top | |
Roaad  LSU Fan Bushrod Owns Member since Aug 2006 50398 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 11:50 am to Freauxzen)
quote:
The film itself was too heavy, too risky, and didn't play to oscar-worthy tropes.
well said. If it had laser guns and choreographed combat action scenes, it would have won state.
|
| Back to top | |
Patrick_Bateman  USA Fan Member since Jan 2012 5087 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 12:23 pm to Roaad)
quote:
But Children of Men is among the greatest films ever made, and was AT LEAST as good as The Departed.
Evidently, I may be in the minority on this board, but I disagree completely with everything in that quote. Children of Men was a good movie, and it probably deserved a nomination, but it wasn't much better (if at all) than the other nominees. I've seen all of them except Letters from Iwo Jima. I definitely prefer The Departed to CoM, and The Queen, Little Miss Sunshine, and Babel are all toss-ups IMO. I've only seen Babel once, but I really enjoyed it (if memory serves). All are good movies.
This post was edited on 1/24 at 12:29 pm
|
| Back to top | |
alajones  LSU Fan Barksdale AFB Member since Oct 2005 19229 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 12:50 pm to Patrick_Bateman)
My mother keeps bugging me to watch the Queen. And I think I would like Babel. I like those movies like that that have big ensemble cast and intertwining stories. Like Grand Canyon, Amores Perros, etc. Not like Valentine's Day.
This post was edited on 1/24 at 12:51 pm
|
| Back to top | |
Froman  LSU Fan Baton Rouge Member since Jun 2007 18668 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 12:52 pm to Patrick_Bateman)
Babel and The Queen were the weakest of those films. The Queen was only good because Helen Mirren had such a great performance.
|
| Back to top | |
SlowFlowPro  Stanford Fan Equality is a circle, not a = Member since Jan 2004 263407 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:05 pm to Freauxzen)
quote:
The film itself was too heavy, too risky, and didn't play to oscar-worthy tropes.
what about Babel, though? Babel fricking sucked a big cock AND it was risky and didn't really hit the "all american" nerve for an oscar
This post was edited on 1/24 at 1:05 pm
|
| Back to top | |
SlowFlowPro  Stanford Fan Equality is a circle, not a = Member since Jan 2004 263407 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:06 pm to Patrick_Bateman)
quote:
I've only seen Babel once, but I really enjoyed it (if memory serves)

|
| Back to top | |
Carson123987  LSU Fan Middle Court at The Rec Member since Jul 2011 23078 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro)

|
| Back to top | |
Patrick_Bateman  USA Fan Member since Jan 2012 5087 posts

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro)
FWIW, more people than not agree with me. LINK /
|
| Back to top | |
SlowFlowPro  Stanford Fan Equality is a circle, not a = Member since Jan 2004 263407 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:17 pm to Patrick_Bateman)
Babel is one of those movies that makes you think it's better than it is via presentation. you FEEL like this is supposed to be some profound statement, and people don't have the balls to be like "this fricking suuuuuuucks." this happens on the flip side, too. Gigli was not nearly as bad as it was made out to be, yet critics were scared to be "that guy" who defended it. and i don't mean pulling an Armand Williams...i mean legitimately defending it
|
| Back to top | |
Carson123987  LSU Fan Middle Court at The Rec Member since Jul 2011 23078 posts
Online

| re: How was Children of Men not even mentioned for best picture for the 79th AA (Posted on 1/24/13 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro)
quote:
Babel is one of those movies that makes you think it's better than it is via presentation. you FEEL like this is supposed to be some profound statement, and people don't have the balls to be like "this fricking suuuuuuucks."
wow someone who understands
|
| Back to top | |