Started By
Message
locked post

Do we have another Dorsey on roster, or prospect the next couple years?

Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:24 am
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43067 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:24 am
Our interior line has been less than stellar imo. Do we have any true DL studs that can pressure/sack a QB from the guard/tackle positions? We had a good string of guys with Dorsey, Kyle Williams, Booger, etc but we've dropped off since then.

Wondering if any current commits, or hopefuls for 2013/14 might fit the bill....
This post was edited on 11/27/12 at 7:26 am
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39103 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:29 am to
Brockers was a stud. You need to include him on that list. He didn't have the quick first move those other guys had, but he dominated the line of scrimmage. When comparing last year to this year, we are better (older) at every position, and our LBers are better, but we are not as good as a whole. The only difference is Brockers.

As far as current talent, who knows? Anthony Johnson is the man as far as pure talent goes, but he doesn't seem to have the motor. Maybe it'll come.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43067 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:33 am to
Based on looks alone I though Freak would absolutely dominate but he has fallen well short so far. Maybe next year will be his coming out party.

What about the class 2013 or 2014, who's the next great DL?
Posted by rsande2
Member since Jan 2006
3423 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:39 am to
quote:

What about the class 2013 or 2014, who's the next great DL?


If logan comes back logan, after that freak, on the horizon my money is on gilmore.....
Posted by Cousin
The Bayou
Member since Feb 2012
5272 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Maybe next year will be his coming out party.


this right here....
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32776 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Based on looks alone I though Freak would absolutely dominate but he has fallen well short so far. Maybe next year will be his coming out party.


Remember, Brockers was in his 3rd year when he really came into his own (RS So).. Freak is still only in his second year with the program. He'll be a force next year.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32776 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:09 am to
Also, if you look at Covington DT Gerrard McDowell's (sp?) film, the man makes plays all over the field. He's a little on the light side at 250, but we could really make an animal out of him with an extra 30-40 lbs.
This post was edited on 11/27/12 at 8:09 am
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81261 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Based on looks alone I though Freak would absolutely dominate but he has fallen well short so far. Maybe next year will be his coming out party.



he's a true sophmore. He has 13 tackles for loss in his first two years (10 this year with 3 sacks). Dorsey had 6 total tfl in his first 2 years.
This post was edited on 11/27/12 at 8:21 am
Posted by redfieldk717
Alec Box
Member since Oct 2011
28117 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:18 am to
quote:

he's a true sophmore. He has 13 tackles for loss in his first two years. Dorsey had 6 total in his first 2 years.
Posted by tigerbru17
Billy in 4C
Member since Jan 2009
9816 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Also, if you look at Covington DT Gerrard McDowell's (sp?) film, the man makes plays all over the field. He's a little on the light side at 250, but we could really make an animal out of him with an extra 30-40 lbs.

McDowell could absolutely be the next big thing. The kid is so raw from the lack of coaching he has had. Not that stars matter to me, but if McDowell can learn some technique and play with a little more urgency, he will be a high 4, no doubt.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32776 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:26 am to
I think he'll be a 4 regardless of technique, based off pure potential. Many times, some of the best prospects come from schools that don't provide the best coaching, and they still dominate based off strictly raw talent. But, I agree, with a little coaching and a redshirt year to bulk up, he could be a force.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43067 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:30 am to
Is Mcdowell committed? Does he have an offer?

thx
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32776 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:44 am to
No offer yet (he's 2014). Per rivals, he currently holds an offer from Kansas State.

ETA: He's a camp offer IMO
This post was edited on 11/27/12 at 8:50 am
Posted by smash williams
San Diego
Member since Apr 2009
19744 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:49 am to
With Downs leaving, Freak will shine. He has already shown he can get penetration.
Posted by judge
Houston
Member since Jan 2008
276 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:25 am to
With his qucikness and explosive firt step, you would have thought he would be the ideal 1 (3 Tech) gap DT
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
29953 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:26 am to
Freak has had a better year than Logan
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16376 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:32 am to
I think Freak can be. He seemed to be our best interior DL this year.
Posted by 228Tiger
Harrison County
Member since Feb 2012
12112 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:50 am to
Gilmore
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 10:07 am to
I thought about this yesterday.. life is such a coincidence.

Was thinking of Dorsey at LSU and how much Freak has the potential (if anybody) to be the next Dorsey. Altho Dorsey's don't just grow on trees.. Freak can be that great.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28245 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Brockers was a stud. You need to include him on that list. He didn't have the quick first move those other guys had, but he dominated the line of scrimmage. When comparing last year to this year, we are better (older) at every position, and our LBers are better, but we are not as good as a whole. The only difference is Brockers.


100%

Brockers was a monster last year. I think we can all agree that it doesn't seem like LSU pressured the QB this year like they did last year. Brockers collapsed the middle time and time again, allowing Mathieu, Brooks, et al to get there before the QB could move. Remember though, Brokers was a DE when he first got to LSU. Is there anyone who is a current "DE" who has the potential to grow into the body type of a DL while still maintaining the DE pass rush ability?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram