- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Horrible WR routes on 2nd Mettenberger fumble
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:53 pm
Check out the extremely poor routes that were run on the play where Mett was sacked and fumbled. This play was either poorly designed or executed.
We have at least two receivers running to the SAME SPOT!
The protection was there, but the receivers failed to get separation and ran to the same spot. That's on them.
Video
We have at least two receivers running to the SAME SPOT!
The protection was there, but the receivers failed to get separation and ran to the same spot. That's on them.
Video
19
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:55 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
the receivers failed to get separation and ran to the same spot
huh? Landry looks open on the still picture
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:56 pm to TigerWerm
Max will love that picture. 
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:56 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
The protection was there
except for that part where mett was about to get raped by a linebacker while our lineman is taking a breather on the ground.
This still doesn't really prove anything other than that we didn't get to see anything develop since he he tucked it and tried to squeeze out of there before he got prison raped in the back field.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:57 pm to EarthwormJim
yeah.. look who is on the ground
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:57 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
The protection was there
lol Josh Doyrowisotycksdf looks like he usually does in that picture.
His cut block was terrible.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:57 pm to TigerWerm
I'm a self-acclaimed 'clueless' on the OL schemes but the other thing that stands out from the photo is that AU rushed 3. We have JD iso'd on Lemonier and 3 on 1 on the right side. Just seems like a misappropriate use of resources.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:57 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
We have at least two receivers running to the SAME SPOT!
The protection was there, but the receivers failed to get separation and ran to the same spot. That's on them.
Mett was looking the other way and if I remember right, the announcers said because of Josh's cut block, it looked like it should have been a quick pass to the left.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:58 pm to TigerWerm
Also see 68 on the ground.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:58 pm to TigerWerm
It's a 5 WR set with Mett alone in the backfield. He really should have a ticker in his head. It was supposed to be a quick pass. It wasn't there or the WR messed up, but Mett needs to be able to protect the football better.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:58 pm to HeadChange
quote:
Mett was looking the other way and if I remember right, the announcers said because of Josh's cut block, it looked like it should have been a quick pass to the left.
This is also true
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:59 pm to brewhan davey
I'd like to see the left side of the field...that's why Josh D was cutting the DE. Suppose to be something quick.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:59 pm to alajones
again. Landry is open. Mett looking left, Landry open on right out pattern looks like
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:59 pm to Broketec
quote:
except for that part where mett was about to get raped by a linebacker while our lineman is taking a breather on the ground.
This still doesn't really prove anything other than that we didn't get to see anything develop since he he tucked it and tried to squeeze out of there before he got prison raped in the back field.
well, was 3rd and 4, so that pass has to come out of his hand quickly, in anticipation of receiving some pressure.
He held the ball too long, regardless of Josh D.'s terrible block.
It should have been three steps BOOM ball out of his hands to J. Landry for a 5 yd gain.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:59 pm to TigerWerm
It was a short route on the near side that got jumped, hence the failed cut-block. The far side routes were ghosts, or epic fail/misread by the wr's. Still bad design, and couldn't tell if there was an outlet/second choice. I hope it just was a bad design, and not his only option.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:00 pm to HeadChange
quote:
Mett was looking the other way and if I remember right, the announcers said because of Josh's cut block, it looked like it should have been a quick pass to the left.
It looks like it should have been a quick out to Landry on the right. Mett decided not to throw it for whatever reason, maybe because the TE was too close to the receiver.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:00 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
Horrible WR routes on 2nd Mettenberger fumble
All I see is Dworaczyk getting beasted in a 5 on 3 scenario.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:01 pm to TigerWerm
Eric Reid's tackling on that sequence was horrendous.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:05 pm to BOZ4LSU
quote:
Also see 68 on the ground.
although poorly executed, that is where you end up on a cut block...
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:05 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
It should have been three steps BOOM ball out of his hands to J. Landry for a 5 yd gain.
Except for the fact that it was designed to be a 3 step BOOM to the left side of the field.
You're drawing conclusions based on information no one had when the play was called, ball was snapped or drop back was made.
In hindsight, had he known he'd have a quick out to the right before he snapped the ball, sure, why not.
You're taking a lot of credit away from a good defensive playcall and putting too much blame on LSU and Mett.
I could hindsight every single play of every game 3 seconds after the ball was snapped, take a screen shot of it and point out whats wrong with it. You're reaching.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News