vs. 45 rushes for over 270? Damn!!!

Someone else may have brought this up earlier, but when you are leading by 11 and have the ability to run, why not run? That stood out the most when looking at the totals.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Brageous

Member since Jul 2008

107724 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 9:55 pm to oak71

47 of those yards were on ONE RUSH.

Did you even watch the game?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by oak71

Mesa, AZ

Member since Jun 2008

2580 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 9:56 pm to Brageous

quote:
Did you even watch the game?

No I live in Arizona. Watched the Cardinals shite on the Eagles.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SOCAL TIGER

SOCAL

Member since Jan 2005

10722 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 9:57 pm to oak71

Is this the Mark Ingram bust post?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by saintsfan22

baton rouge

Member since May 2006

71596 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 9:59 pm to oak71

We tried to run with the lead and one time Pierre went into the line and bounced back like he hit an invisible forcefield.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by oak71

Mesa, AZ

Member since Jun 2008

2580 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 10:03 pm to saintsfan22

quote:
We tried to run with the lead and one time Pierre went into the line and bounced back like he hit an invisible forcefield.

Well that sounds pretty fricking hopeless.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by ATLienTiger

NOLA

Member since Oct 2006

26861 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 10:03 pm to saintsfan22

our line was bad bad bad

they have been trash in pass protection every game, but seeing them suck it up on run blocking as well was such a disappointment.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by CM84

Louisiana

Member since Nov 2007

2603 posts

Posted on 9/23/12 at 10:04 pm to oak71

We did run the majority on first downs with the lead. Instead of being 2nd and 6 or 2nd and 5, it was 2nd and 10 or 2nd and 12. Saints had no success running the ball, minus Sproles long run.

Page 1