Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Roy Hodgsons's new formation for England

Posted on 5/17/12 at 9:25 am
Posted by BobLoblaw
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2011
2324 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 9:25 am
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 9:54 am to


I too think that the 0-0-0-0 formation is more flexible than the 0-0-0.
Posted by BobLoblaw
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2011
2324 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 10:00 am to
quote:

“It’s not the most physical line-up, given that it lacks any corporeal form, and I wouldn’t expect us to dominate possession,” he added. “But I’m confident that this team can be more than the sum of its non-existent parts.”


quote:

Reaction among supporters to everyone’s omission has been mixed, however.

“It’s great to see Roy get rid of the dead wood, but I worry about this team’s strength in depth,” said England fans’ spokesman Hugh Merryweather. “We’re lightweight in every position, and there’s literally no-one on the bench.”

“Also, I can’t believe he picked Stewart Downing.”


This post was edited on 5/17/12 at 10:01 am
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 10:02 am to
quote:

"It's good to see Roy get rid of the deadwood, but I'm worried about the team's strength in depth."

This is outstanding.

The worst problem for Roy, though? He picked Stuart Downing.
Posted by UASports23
Member since Nov 2009
24350 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 10:17 am to
How does it feel if you're Micah or Rio and Stuart gets the call up, instead of you.
Posted by BobLoblaw
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2011
2324 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 10:20 am to
all 3 play different positions
Posted by xavierTIGER
Black Pearl
Member since Jan 2007
2203 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 10:54 am to
quote:

The worst problem for Roy, though? He picked Stuart Downing.

Obviously I agree that Downing had an abysmal year in 11/12...trust me, I watched every excruciating minute of it. However, for some reason he played much better in the England shirt throughout the year. We've all seen him play well in the past and I'm not certain that this was a horrible call up.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Obviously I agree that Downing had an abysmal year in 11/12. However, for some reason he played much better in the England shirt throughout the year. We've all seen him play well in the past and I'm not certain that this was a horrible call up.


agreed. I mean what midfielder would have been a better call up?
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

However, for some reason he played much better in the England shirt throughout the year.


So he's the English Klose?
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
28432 posts
Posted on 5/18/12 at 3:53 am to
quote:

agreed. I mean what midfielder would have been a better call up?



Scholes. Easy question to answer. Find me a pure center mid who has been better throughout the second half of the year.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 5/18/12 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

Scholes. Easy question to answer. Find me a pure center mid who has been better throughout the second half of the year.


Scholes obviously said no LOL. England's been trying to get him to play since he retired.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram