Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Can banks lease REOs?

Posted on 12/20/11 at 10:37 am
Posted by geauxtigers12
Member since Oct 2006
445 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 10:37 am
I know that they are in the business of lending money and don't want to take on this liability. Is this legal? Are there any special rules or regulations that banks must follow?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 10:57 am to
What do you think banks have in the way of liability exposure for the properties in their REO portfolios? They have to insure themselves against claims for all of the properties, and it isn't cheap. Do you think they want to operate in a manner that increases their exposure? And leasing would increase the exposure due to increased human activities in and around the properties.
Posted by 12more
Member since Jun 2011
617 posts
Posted on 12/20/11 at 3:28 pm to
I don't know of any laws preventing them from doing so, but as was previously stated, I doubt many banks would want to take on the additional liability. Since banks don't generally have a property management division, it's unlikely that they would want to bother with day to day responsibilities just to make a little extra cash while the property is sitting there. I'm sure there are some small niche servicers out there that do this but I doubt there are many.
Posted by blacykaty
Katy, Texas
Member since Nov 2009
480 posts
Posted on 12/22/11 at 1:36 pm to
12more is correct - no lender will lease a REO. They want to sell it and get it off of their books. It affects how much they are able to lend to others. Also, as previously stated, the liability is way to high.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram