if Oregon has 1 loss, and wins the PAC-12...

No, Bama would be the stronger team because Oregon lost worse than them.

quote:

---

No, Bama would be the stronger team because Oregon lost worse than them.

---

Um, no. That's not why.

quote:

---

But bama loss was at home, oregon on neutral site...I don't want a rematch with anyone. BRING ON THE FRESH MEAT!!!

---

THAT'S NOT HOW IT WOULD BE JUDGED.

quote:

---

this is true even though Bama lost at home, and was favored?

---

Good Christ...

I hope not, I'd much rather see a Bama-LSU rematch than Oregon-Lsu. I'd prefer to see Boise if they're the only undefeated left, but that wont happen.

If Oklahoma St. loses to Oklahoma and Oregon beats Stanford this weekend and then beats UCLA (or whoever) in the PAC12 championship. Oregon will leap Alabama in the final polls and play LSU.

Oregon might even be ranked #3 in the human polls but the computers will jump them past Alabama.
12-1 Oregon is better in the computers than 11-1 Alabama.

This is pretty much what happened to LSU in 2003. We were 3 in the human polls at 12-1 and lept USC who didn't have a championship game at 11-1.

LSU - Oregon rematch is very possible.

Oregon still has USC left, which win will still count in the computers. Plus if USC beats UCLA, Oregon will get ASU to further enhance their resume.

This might help when studying the craziness of the BCS system

2003 BCS

scroll all the way down to the week of Dec 6th -after the SEC CG. Notice how prior to championship weekend It was #1 Oklahoma 12-0, #2 USC 11-1, #3 LSU 11-1.

After we win the SEC CG and Oklahoma loses the Big 12 Championship game it changes to USC#1 LSU #2, Oklahoma #3 in the human polls. But the only two 12-1 teams became the top 2 in the BCS polls
BCS
I still don't think undefeated Boise St. gets in there.

quote:

---

that CCG win wouldn't push them past Alabama...??

---

NO.