- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why I don't want a rematch
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:36 am
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:36 am
Im not against the concept but for weeks now, I've been hoping that either LSU or Bama gets Boise at the end.
If Boise plays Stanford or Okie St, it will be a scorefest. Screw that, Boise needs to be thoroughly humbled by a team that stones their offense while siultaneously running the ball down their throat all night!!!
If Boise plays Stanford or Okie St, it will be a scorefest. Screw that, Boise needs to be thoroughly humbled by a team that stones their offense while siultaneously running the ball down their throat all night!!!
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:38 am to ShortyRob
Bama had their chance and couldn't get it done...at their house, no less.
They're in our rearview mirror now. Better things ahead.
They're in our rearview mirror now. Better things ahead.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:39 am to ShortyRob
I am.The loser of the first game has the emotional edge for the rematch.Thanks, no, Bammers had theirs shot AT HOME.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:40 am to ShortyRob
ive been hoping for the same thing, but voters likely will put bama ahead of boise in the polls anyways
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:40 am to cosmicdingo
I agree, but I think both OK state and stanford both get beat..
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:42 am to cosmicdingo
That would be unfair to LSU. No rematch, LSU handled their business.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:44 am to ShortyRob
I would prefer either Boise St or Stanford to be honest.
With Boise St., I think we put to rest the myth.
With Stanford, we get what should be a very good game against a great quaterback.
With Boise St., I think we put to rest the myth.
With Stanford, we get what should be a very good game against a great quaterback.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:46 am to Cornholio
Unfair to LSU - agreed. We have been through the gauntlet this year and succeeded resoundingly. But we still have 4 more games (SEC Champ included if we win out). Bama doesn't have to play SECCG, but they will argue they get another shot at the best? No way.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:48 am to Cornholio
quote:
That would be unfair to LSU. No rematch, LSU handled their business
I agree, why should we have to beat Bama twice in one season to win the Championship.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 7:50 am
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:49 am to bamaswallows
Unfair to LSU - agreed. We have been through the gauntlet this year and succeeded resoundingly. But we still have 4 more games (SEC Champ included if we win out). Bama doesn't have to play SECCG, but they will argue they get another shot at the best? No way.
THIS !
THIS !
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:51 am to ShortyRob
I would rather see LSU vs Stanford, so that we can say we beat the cream of the crop for the Pac 12 in 2011.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:52 am to lsuag88
Wait, are we the same fanbase who slams the AP (bc of 2003). Play it out and let the computers do their thing. If we play them again, we play them again. Why so scared?
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:53 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Wait, are we the same fanbase who slams the AP (bc of 2003). Play it out and let the computers do their thing. If we play them again, we play them again. Why so scared?
because rematches always favor the loser of the first game
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:53 am to RealityTiger
Unless other teams start losing a lot it will never ever happen.
The best case scenario would have been if Bama was in the East and still made it to the SEC Championship game and then beat LSU. A NC tiebreaker would be amazing, but even this scenario would still have to rely on a bunch of 2 loss BCS teams.
The best case scenario would have been if Bama was in the East and still made it to the SEC Championship game and then beat LSU. A NC tiebreaker would be amazing, but even this scenario would still have to rely on a bunch of 2 loss BCS teams.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:54 am to theunknownknight
quote:This thread has gotten off track. I'd very much enjoy a rematch.
Wait, are we the same fanbase who slams the AP (bc of 2003). Play it out and let the computers do their thing. If we play them again, we play them again. Why so scared?
I'm just COMPLETELY over the Boise crap and want them to abused by Bama or LSU.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:55 am to ShortyRob
quote:
I'm just COMPLETELY over the Boise crap and want them to abused by Bama or LSU.
MF'ing this.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:55 am to TiketheMiger
But most of us were hoping for a rematch if we lost.
With that said, Bama was at home so maybe they dont deserve a rematch.
But then again, if we can beat them at home, I know we can beat them in New Orleans.
With that said, Bama was at home so maybe they dont deserve a rematch.
But then again, if we can beat them at home, I know we can beat them in New Orleans.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 7:57 am to ShortyRob
As recent as 1996 , Florida did it against FSU - and for them it was a revenge game in the Sugar Bowl for the national title.
For LSU it would merely be a repeat of 2003 Georgia - beating them home and away
For LSU it would merely be a repeat of 2003 Georgia - beating them home and away
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News