Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Arkansas not getting a host site worries me

Posted on 5/29/11 at 7:52 pm
Posted by LSUbsBALL
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
1585 posts
Posted on 5/29/11 at 7:52 pm
It makes me think the NCAA comittee doesn't think much of the SEC, and since we finished 9th I'm a little concerned. I just want to be sent anywhere even if it's againts bower and UCLA again.

On a side note it's pathetic that UCLA got a host site. Southern has a better stadium than them. Well maybe not but you get my point
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26578 posts
Posted on 5/29/11 at 7:55 pm to
I think it's simply rewarding UCLA for winning the Pac-10. Kind of bullshite, but I wouldn't look too much into that one. Now when Sunbelt teams start getting in over us, I'll be pissed.
This post was edited on 5/29/11 at 7:56 pm
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 5/29/11 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Southern has a better stadium than them.


Well atleast UCLA doesn't have bums sitting on the overpass shooting up Heroin while watching the game for free.

That's about the only difference.
This post was edited on 5/29/11 at 7:59 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164112 posts
Posted on 5/29/11 at 8:00 pm to
15-15 won't host.
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
20204 posts
Posted on 5/29/11 at 8:12 pm to
The Committee wanted to have more than 2 West Coast sites. I think that's the main reason why Arkansas didn't host.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram