- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bourne Identity
Posted on 12/29/10 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 12/29/10 at 5:12 pm
Anyone seen this?
This post was edited on 12/29/10 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 12/29/10 at 6:58 pm to Helo
Yeah I didn't like it all that much. Normally when a movie comes out that happens to be a remake I'll end up watching the oldest one just before or after I see the new one. The Matt Damon one just really kicked arse for me....the Richard Chamberlain one, not so much. I had to rent it at the old blockbuster in Leesville around 2002 or so and it seemed like it was made for TV by the quality of the tape.
Did you like it?
Did you like it?
Posted on 12/29/10 at 7:04 pm to Michael J Cocks
had no idea it was a remake.
Posted on 12/29/10 at 7:21 pm to Helo
Yeah, I did years ago. It seems like it was much more of a romance than an action flick? Matt Damon was definitely more of a bad-arse.
Posted on 12/29/10 at 7:29 pm to Michael J Cocks
quote:
Did you like it?
I haven't seen it but have been thinking about renting it. I like Chamberlain but the new trilogy is so amazing I cannot see how he could stack up to Damon.
Posted on 12/29/10 at 7:41 pm to Acreboy
quote:
had no idea it was a remake.
well not tit for tat, but pretty much the same premise...SPOILERS:
he washes up on shore with amnesia, chick finds him and takes care of him etc...pretty much the same type of shite as the Damon version. Both of course are based on the book.
Posted on 12/29/10 at 9:26 pm to Michael J Cocks
quote:
Normally when a movie comes out that happens to be a remake I'll end up watching the oldest one just before or after I see the new one.
What about this one? Silent film. came on AMC last week actually.
This post was edited on 12/29/10 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 12/29/10 at 9:28 pm to Michael J Cocks
quote:
Yeah I didn't like it all that much. Normally when a movie comes out that happens to be a remake I'll end up watching the oldest one just before or after I see the new one. The Matt Damon one just really kicked arse for me....the Richard Chamberlain one, not so much. I had to rent it at the old blockbuster in Leesville around 2002 or so and it seemed like it was made for TV by the quality of the tape.
Yeah, those are pretty much my thoughts word-for-word.
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:17 pm to Augustus
The original was a made for TV during the Richard Chamberlain frenzy. I am a huge Ludlum fan and the Bourne Identity is one my my all time favorite books, so I hated the Chamberlain version. If I remember correctly, it was a 2 or 3 part mini series.
The Matt Damon movies are much better as far as movies go, but they have very little in common with the novels, because the books are dated.
The Matt Damon movies are much better as far as movies go, but they have very little in common with the novels, because the books are dated.
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:38 pm to Broken Coyote
Yea the older one stays truer to the books, the Damon one is a better updated movie. Good books though.
Posted on 12/30/10 at 1:44 am to Acreboy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
had no idea it was a remake.
your kidding right?
had no idea it was a remake.
your kidding right?
Posted on 12/30/10 at 1:45 am to craw
Haven't seen it, but surely it can't be any worse than the garbage Matt Damon/Bourne trilogy.
Posted on 12/30/10 at 1:47 am to BradPitt
Sounds right from Alabama fan!!
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News