- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ULL, ULM offenses ranked ahead of LSU
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:43 am
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:43 am
Holy crap! Is this possible? I'm afraid it is. Offensive ranks as of this point in the season:
ULM: 95; ULL: 100; LSU: 102.
LINK
ULM: 95; ULL: 100; LSU: 102.
LINK
6
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:43 am to jim712
OUCH!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:43 am to jim712
ULL was trounced this weekend. You really want to change. Terrible thread.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:44 am to jim712
To be honest, it's half the offense. the running game is doing it's job. Don't lump in the ENTIRE offense into these results.
This post was edited on 9/27/10 at 8:45 am
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:44 am to jim712
This surprises you why???
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:44 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
You really want to change. Terrible thread.
Not really.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:45 am to jim712
Even better, there are only two teams from BCS conferences with offenses below LSU.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:49 am to skullhawk
But most of the BCS teams have records worse that LSU. I think I would rather be 4-0 with a crappy offense than 0-4 and have the #1 rated offense.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:52 am to WacoTiger
quote:
But most of the BCS teams have records worse that LSU. I think I would rather be 4-0 with a crappy offense than 0-4 and have the #1 rated offense.
Nonsense statement. Only one team ranked in the top ten for offense does not have a winning record and they are 2-2. Furthermore, if you don't see something a bit illusory about our 4-0 record then you are not paying attention.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:53 am to skullhawk
And there are still many that chastise and pound their chests about 4-0 ... when there is obviously major reason for concern.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:53 am to jim712
what's illusory about it?
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:53 am to WacoTiger
quote:
But most of the BCS teams have records worse that LSU. I think I would rather be 4-0 with a crappy offense than 0-4 and have the #1 rated offense.
I don't disagree with you but I remember us starting off 5-0 the past two seasons. Where did we end up?
You can't continually ask the defense to hold teams to so few points. Florida, Auburn, Bama, and Arkansas can move the ball better than any of our previous opponents. We will go 0-4 in those games if the offense doesn't improve and the defense keeps doing what they are doing.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:58 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
what's illusory about it?
North Carolina: depleted squad; fortunate to win.
Vandy, Miss St.: lower tier SEC teams (State is a solid club though)
W. Virginia: Our offense has one drive (one drive!) longer than 20 yards. Only offensive touchdown came on a 7 (7!) yard drive that took four plays to score a TD. Teams will generally lose 90% of their games where this happens.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 8:59 am to jim712
So what. We'd beat both of them.
Posted on 9/27/10 at 9:01 am to jim712
quote:
Our offense has one drive (one drive!) longer than 20 yards
Is that accurate?
Posted on 9/27/10 at 3:51 pm to jim712
Your argument is not illusory, it is false. I don't know what is illusory about our 4-0 record. It is a fact - not deceptive, not unreal, not misleading, but an actual fact.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News