- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why is it that...
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:39 am
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:39 am
Arky got a regional? i mean we had 2 more losses then them and they lost two strait in the sec tourny...
4
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:40 am to tiger25
Lost 14/18.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:41 am to tiger25
quote:
two strait
Any relation to George Strait?
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:42 am to tiger25
In their defense they were also without Zach Cox, Brett Eibner, and one other key guy they lost in the first game in the SEC tourny. That is the equivelant of us losing Gibbs, Mahtook, and Dean.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:42 am to tiger25
And now for the real answer.
You people are treating the SEC tournament like it was 10000 times more important than the regular season, ESPECIALLY since we won it. The committee actually does look at what happened before May 30 when seeding teams.
You people are treating the SEC tournament like it was 10000 times more important than the regular season, ESPECIALLY since we won it. The committee actually does look at what happened before May 30 when seeding teams.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:45 am to LSUGrad9295
What pisses me off is they care more about us going 4-14 than they do us starting out 32-6. There is no such thing as each game counting equally. It's all what have you done for me lately.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:47 am to LSUtoOmaha
What you do in conference is most important to them, as it should be for SEC teams. That's when you play your best competition, and they see a 4-14 streak to finish out the year mostly in-conference.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:51 am to Jeeves
I agree that we should not be a host, for two simple reasons: 1. We weren't a top 16 RPI, and 2. We went 14-16 in conference.
But it should have nothing to do with "streaks." Who cares how many we won or lost consecutively? It should be about the numbers as a whole. Weight should not be added towards the last month of the season.
But it should have nothing to do with "streaks." Who cares how many we won or lost consecutively? It should be about the numbers as a whole. Weight should not be added towards the last month of the season.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:53 am to LSUtoOmaha
im not saying that we should be hosting im just saying that i dont think arky should be hosting.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 12:57 am to LSUtoOmaha
it worked for us in 2008...
Posted on 6/1/10 at 2:07 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
it worked for us in 2008...
In 2008 we also finished 43-16, and 18-11 in conference play. That's a pretty big difference from 40-20, 14-16.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 2:08 am to LSUtoOmaha
.500 in the SEC. the sweeps at the end killed lsu's chances of hosting a regional.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 2:09 am to sheek
quote:
.500 in the SEC. the sweeps at the end killed lsu's chances of hosting a regional.
What killed, or should have killed LSU's chances of hosting is the sub .500 conference record, not the fact that we lost games at the end of the season.
Posted on 6/1/10 at 2:13 am to LSUtoOmaha
my point is if we won 2 out of 3 instead of the sweeps we took, we wouldn't have a sub .500 record in the sec. and this weekend I would be at the box instead of listening to JH butcher the games.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News