Started By
Message
locked post

Ok, so for the washington game in the fall

Posted on 3/22/09 at 10:08 pm
Posted by natethegreat
Member since Dec 2008
740 posts
Posted on 3/22/09 at 10:08 pm
How many yards is charles scott going to rush for?

I say 587.

Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 3/22/09 at 10:09 pm to
32
Posted by slaughlin
North Dad Gum Louisiana
Member since Apr 2008
3100 posts
Posted on 3/22/09 at 11:29 pm to
OK, we have now seen the two ridiculous extremes. Allow me to be the voice of reason. I'll say 170
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 3/22/09 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

I'll say 170


i wouldn't be surprised. he should break 100 pretty easily. if you look at the box score from the USC-UW game they did nothing but run the ball from about half way through the 2nd quarter on and UW was helpless. seriously, USC didn't throw one pass and still marched up and down the field at will. UW is horrible and their run D is pathetic
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71700 posts
Posted on 3/22/09 at 11:43 pm to
well, former USC defensive coordinator nick holt is their DC now

i know carroll runs that d, but im sure the UW defense will be a lot better
Posted by mlttiger
Member since Feb 2009
3974 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 12:09 am to
Whats the college football record? I say that +1 haha
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 12:11 am to
It depends on how long he plays before he gets taken out. It'll be 100+ most likely. But how much over 100 depends on how much Crowton wants to throw in the first half.
Posted by mhsdeuce07
Member since Dec 2006
8238 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 12:12 am to
112
Posted by tbrig3211
New Orleans
Member since May 2006
2601 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 12:12 am to
quote:

well, former USC defensive coordinator nick holt is their DC now i know carroll runs that d, but im sure the UW defense will be a lot better


coaching wont matter all that much with the complete lack of talent at that school. as much as i would like to see us run for 250+... i would like to see our young qb throw the ball around well, if for nothing more than to gain confidence.
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13233 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 8:48 am to
scott-117
kw-105
murphy-62
Posted by Bear Is Dead
Monroe
Member since Nov 2007
4696 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 8:57 am to
I agree, CS will get a standard 150, then get pulled because that game will be an arse-ladeling.
Posted by noladan
new orleans
Member since Nov 2003
3802 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 9:01 am to
If our defense hasn't improved an equally good question will be how many yards will Jake Locker run for......He was hurt most of last year which really hurt their offense.
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30615 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 11:15 am to
quote:

if you look at the box score from the USC-UW game they did nothing but run the ball from about half way through the 2nd quarter on and UW was helpless. seriously


+1

Rush Yards vs Washington 2008:

Oregon= 256
BYU= 137
OU= 274
Stanford= 244
Arizona= 256
Oregon State= 230
Notre Dame= 252
USC= 297
Arizona St= 182
UCLA= 157
Washington St= 171
Cal= 431, WHOA


LSU might find success with running the ball against Washington,
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13233 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 3:33 pm to
i feel pretty good
Posted by ToesOnTheNose213
The present
Member since Oct 2007
2028 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Rush Yards vs Washington 2008:
Oregon= 256
BYU= 137
OU= 274
Stanford= 244
Arizona= 256
Oregon State= 230
Notre Dame= 252
USC= 297
Arizona St= 182
UCLA= 157
Washington St= 171
Cal= 431, WHOA


Hahahahahahahahahaha!

That is embarrassing but effing fantastic!!
Posted by HeartOfGeauxld
Geaux Tigers!
Member since Dec 2008
3005 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 5:15 pm to
I think it will be a laugher by the second quarter. And Les will empty his bench.

So my guess is Scott gets around 50-60 yards before being pulled.

Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 5:16 pm to
The better question is:

In what quarter does Lee take his first snap?
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51593 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 5:16 pm to
+1

ridiculous numbers, they just quit on their coach. the two washington schools were all time horrible. hurt USC's chances to get into the title game
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65105 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Oregon= 256
BYU= 137
OU= 274
Stanford= 244
Arizona= 256
Oregon State= 230
Notre Dame= 252
USC= 297
Arizona St= 182
UCLA= 157
Washington St= 171
Cal= 431, WHOA


Good god
Posted by HeartOfGeauxld
Geaux Tigers!
Member since Dec 2008
3005 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

ridiculous numbers, they just quit on their coach. the two washington schools were all time horrible. hurt USC's chances to get into the title game


I think the Huskies also set back their chances of getting their new stadium built. The state of Washington doesn't look all that eager to foot the bill.

This post was edited on 3/23/09 at 5:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram