Started By
Message

re: New Beretta 92gts.....with no rail???

Posted on 4/6/24 at 11:07 am to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 11:07 am to
The 92's just have an ultra long reach for the DA pull. The 92s I've shot all had ok triggers.

The M9 I used to have on the other hand was very long and very heavy. It was horrible. I guess it has heavier springs than the regular 92's.
Posted by Bama and Beer
Baldwin Co, AL
Member since Oct 2010
80923 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 12:43 pm to
In all honesty, who am I kidding?

I don't shoot enough 9MM rounds a year to really give a frick about a stock trigger. I'm a pretty below average shot with a pistol because I simply don't shoot enough. Triggers matter but to me it's just about taking others out to enjoy shooting more than anything. Teaching my son, my step son, and my wife is what I love to do.

The older I get, the more firearms I purchase to enjoy and shoot but ultimately to pass on to my only child; my son. I bought an AR at the end of last year and haven't even shot it yet. I'll do that with my family hopefully next weekend. My dad taught me everything about firearms and I want to continue that 'tradition' with my son.

Back on topic, Berettas are always something I've wanted and will have eventually have. I'll stick to the M9 for nostalgia reasons more than anything else
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260904 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:


I don't shoot enough 9MM rounds a year to really give a frick about a stock trigger.


Yeah, Im not a prolific shooter. I do enough to stay accurate.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram